Difference between revisions of "Start-Up Guide (Issue Brief)"
DylanDickens (talk | contribs) |
DylanDickens (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
| + | Every entrepreneurship ecosystem consists of a delicate balance between innovative thinkers, ambitious business owners, market forces and entrepreneurship institutions. These institutions, ranging from accelerators and incubators to hubs and co-working spaces, provide key services to aspiring entrepreneurs. After founding a start-up, entrepreneurs require every possible edge they can get in order to maximize their idea's potential. Houston, the largest city in a state plagued with a dearth of venture capital, stands in a position to change the narrative of Texan entrepreneurship. Through an analysis of the major entrepreneurship institutions located in Houston, the McNair Center has complied a guide for start-up entrepreneurs, academics, and policy makers to help navigate and better understand the options, successes and failures of the Houston entrepreneurship ecosystem. For this qualitative and quantitative analysis, each institution must provide a "program" for entrepreneurs and their start-ups to enroll in and go through. The qualitative analysis consists of few key parts, namely what the institution considers itself, the services provided by the institution and the entrepreneurship experience level of the institution's directors. The quantitative analysis investigates how many start-ups that participated in an institution's program received venture capital, were acquired, or exited in an initial public offering or IPO. Other considerations such as repeat dealings with venture capital firms, founding date of institution, non-profit status, and quality of venture capital firms dealt with were kept in mind. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Institutions== | ||
| + | =Houston Accelerators= | ||
| + | ===HHV's NextHIT=== | ||
| + | ===SURGE=== | ||
| + | ===TMCx=== | ||
| + | =Houston University Accelerators= | ||
| + | ===OwlSpark=== | ||
| + | ===RED Labs=== | ||
| + | =Houston Incubators= | ||
| + | ===Redhouse Associates=== | ||
| + | ===HTC=== | ||
| + | =Other Houston Institutions= | ||
| + | ===Fannin Innovation Studio=== | ||
| + | =Non-Houston Comparative Institutions= | ||
| + | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 18:11, 24 October 2016
| Start-Up Guide (Issue Brief) | |
|---|---|
| Project Information | |
| Project Title | |
| Start Date | |
| Deadline | |
| Primary Billing | |
| Notes | |
| Has project status | |
| Copyright © 2016 edegan.com. All Rights Reserved. | |
Under Houston Entrepreneurship umbrella.
Contents
Abstract
Every entrepreneurship ecosystem consists of a delicate balance between innovative thinkers, ambitious business owners, market forces and entrepreneurship institutions. These institutions, ranging from accelerators and incubators to hubs and co-working spaces, provide key services to aspiring entrepreneurs. After founding a start-up, entrepreneurs require every possible edge they can get in order to maximize their idea's potential. Houston, the largest city in a state plagued with a dearth of venture capital, stands in a position to change the narrative of Texan entrepreneurship. Through an analysis of the major entrepreneurship institutions located in Houston, the McNair Center has complied a guide for start-up entrepreneurs, academics, and policy makers to help navigate and better understand the options, successes and failures of the Houston entrepreneurship ecosystem. For this qualitative and quantitative analysis, each institution must provide a "program" for entrepreneurs and their start-ups to enroll in and go through. The qualitative analysis consists of few key parts, namely what the institution considers itself, the services provided by the institution and the entrepreneurship experience level of the institution's directors. The quantitative analysis investigates how many start-ups that participated in an institution's program received venture capital, were acquired, or exited in an initial public offering or IPO. Other considerations such as repeat dealings with venture capital firms, founding date of institution, non-profit status, and quality of venture capital firms dealt with were kept in mind.
