Difference between revisions of "Shepsle, K. (1979), Institutional Arrangements and Equilibrium in Multidimensional Voting Models"

From edegan.com
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Moshe
(New page: ==Paper's Motivation== McKelvey's Chaos Thm: In a multidimensional spacial settings, unless points are distributed in a rare way (like radially symmetric), there is no Condorcet winner, a...)
 
imported>Moshe
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
In response, the author considers voting on one 'attribute' or dimension at a time.
 
In response, the author considers voting on one 'attribute' or dimension at a time.
 +
 +
==Model==
 +
 +
Consider a two-dimensional case.  any policy z_i is chare

Revision as of 14:15, 14 May 2012

Paper's Motivation

McKelvey's Chaos Thm: In a multidimensional spacial settings, unless points are distributed in a rare way (like radially symmetric), there is no Condorcet winner, and whoever controls the order of voting can make any point the final outcome.

In response, the author considers voting on one 'attribute' or dimension at a time.

Model

Consider a two-dimensional case. any policy z_i is chare