Difference between revisions of "Office wishlist"

From edegan.com
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Ed
m (Protected "Office wishlist" [edit=mcnair:move=mcnair:read=mcnair])
imported>Ed
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
==Wished For Items==
 +
 +
 +
==Previously purchased items==
 +
 
#Bluetooth keyboard, Mac compatible [http://www.amazon.com/Compact-Wireless-Bluetooth-Keyboard-Rechargeable/dp/B00PIMKN1Q/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1448315096&sr=8-2&keywords=bluetooth+keyboard+mac]
 
#Bluetooth keyboard, Mac compatible [http://www.amazon.com/Compact-Wireless-Bluetooth-Keyboard-Rechargeable/dp/B00PIMKN1Q/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1448315096&sr=8-2&keywords=bluetooth+keyboard+mac]
 +
 +
 +
==Rejected Items==
 +
 +
Some wished for items might be rejected. Common reasons include that they are too expensive, they suck, we don't need them, or that the director is tight with the budget. A good item from Amazon should have a uni-modal rating of greater than 4 stars with more than 100 reviews. A great item has a nice tight distribution with the vast majority of reviews as 5 stars, some four stars, less three stars, and so on down to almost no 1 stars. A quick perusal of 1 star votes should immediately invoke the desire to commit the logical fallacy of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem ''argumentum ad hominem''].
 +
 +
Rejected items include:
 
#Mouse, Mac compatible [http://www.amazon.com/TopCase-Optical-Wireless-Macbook-Laptop/dp/B0050D2VHW/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1448315198&sr=8-1&keywords=wireless+mouse+mac]
 
#Mouse, Mac compatible [http://www.amazon.com/TopCase-Optical-Wireless-Macbook-Laptop/dp/B0050D2VHW/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1448315198&sr=8-1&keywords=wireless+mouse+mac]
 +
 +
==Understanding Star Ratings==
 +
 +
[[:Image:Star ratings.png]]

Revision as of 01:06, 24 November 2015

Wished For Items

Previously purchased items

  1. Bluetooth keyboard, Mac compatible [1]


Rejected Items

Some wished for items might be rejected. Common reasons include that they are too expensive, they suck, we don't need them, or that the director is tight with the budget. A good item from Amazon should have a uni-modal rating of greater than 4 stars with more than 100 reviews. A great item has a nice tight distribution with the vast majority of reviews as 5 stars, some four stars, less three stars, and so on down to almost no 1 stars. A quick perusal of 1 star votes should immediately invoke the desire to commit the logical fallacy of argumentum ad hominem.

Rejected items include:

  1. Mouse, Mac compatible [2]

Understanding Star Ratings

Image:Star ratings.png