Difference between revisions of "Mortal Reisel (2009) - The Real Benefits Of Being Public Evidence From Public And Private Firms"

From edegan.com
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Article
 
{{Article
 
|Has page=Mortal Reisel (2009) - The Real Benefits Of Being Public Evidence From Public And Private Firms
 
|Has page=Mortal Reisel (2009) - The Real Benefits Of Being Public Evidence From Public And Private Firms
|Has title=
+
|Has bibtex key=
|Has author=
+
|Has article title=The Real Benefits Of Being Public Evidence From Public And Private Firms
|Has year=
+
|Has author=Mortal Reisel
 +
|Has year=2009
 
|In journal=
 
|In journal=
 
|In volume=
 
|In volume=

Latest revision as of 19:15, 29 September 2020

Article
Has bibtex key
Has article title The Real Benefits Of Being Public Evidence From Public And Private Firms
Has author Mortal Reisel
Has year 2009
In journal
In volume
In number
Has pages
Has publisher
© edegan.com, 2016

Reference(s)

  • Mortal, Sandra, and Natalia Reisel (2009), "The real benefits of being public: Evidence from public and private firms", Unpublished working paper, University of Memphis. pdf

Abstract

In this paper, we study efficiency of capital allocation across public and private firms. Using a large dataset that contains financial data on both public and private European firms, we investigate to what extent firms with good (poor) growth opportunities increase (decrease) corporate investment. We find that, on average, public listed firms display higher investment sensitivity to growth opportunities than public unlisted and private firms. This differential, however, only exists in countries with well-developed stock markets. Our results suggest that stock market development provides advantage to public firms in capital allocation over private firms.