Difference between revisions of "Gibbons (2005) - Four Formalizable Theories Of The Firm"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Has title=Four Formalizable Theories Of The Firm | |Has title=Four Formalizable Theories Of The Firm | ||
|Has author= | |Has author= | ||
| − | |Has year= | + | |Has year=2005 |
|In journal= | |In journal= | ||
|In volume= | |In volume= | ||
Revision as of 13:19, 29 September 2020
| Article | |
|---|---|
| Has bibtex key | |
| Has article title | |
| Has year | 2005 |
| In journal | |
| In volume | |
| In number | |
| Has pages | |
| Has publisher | |
| © edegan.com, 2016 | |
Reference(s)
- Gibbons, Robert (2005), "Four formal(izable) theories of the firm?", Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol. 58, pp.200-245. pdf
@article{gibbons2005four,
title={Four formal (izable) theories of the firm?},
author={Gibbons, Robert},
journal={Journal of Economic Behavior \& Organization},
volume={58},
number={2},
pages={200--245},
year={2005},
publisher={Elsevier}
}
Abstract
In this essay, I define and compare elemental versions of four theories of the firm. These elemental theories are distilled from important contributions by Hart, Holmstrom, Klein,Williamson, and others. Although these contributions have been widely cited and much discussed, I have found it difficult to understand the commonalities, distinctions, and potential combinations of these seemingly familiar contributions. In this essay, therefore, I attempt to clarify these issues in three steps: I begin with informal summaries of the theories, then turn to simple but formal statements of each elemental theory, and finally nest the four elemental theories in an integrative framework.
