Difference between revisions of "Gibbons (2005) - Four Formalizable Theories Of The Firm"

From edegan.com
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Ed
(New page: ==Reference(s)== *Gibbons, Robert (2005), "Four formal(izable) theories of the firm?", Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol. 58, pp.200-245. [http://www.edegan.com/pdfs/Gibbons...)
 
imported>Ed
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==Reference(s)==
 
==Reference(s)==
 
*Gibbons, Robert (2005), "Four formal(izable) theories of the firm?", Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol. 58, pp.200-245. [http://www.edegan.com/pdfs/Gibbons%20(2005)%20-%20Four%20formalizable%20theories%20of%20the%20firm.pdf pdf]
 
*Gibbons, Robert (2005), "Four formal(izable) theories of the firm?", Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol. 58, pp.200-245. [http://www.edegan.com/pdfs/Gibbons%20(2005)%20-%20Four%20formalizable%20theories%20of%20the%20firm.pdf pdf]
 +
 +
@article{gibbons2005four,
 +
  title={Four formal (izable) theories of the firm?},
 +
  author={Gibbons, Robert},
 +
  journal={Journal of Economic Behavior \& Organization},
 +
  volume={58},
 +
  number={2},
 +
  pages={200--245},
 +
  year={2005},
 +
  publisher={Elsevier}
 +
}
  
 
==Abstract==
 
==Abstract==
 
In this essay, I define and compare elemental versions of four theories of the firm. These elemental theories are distilled from important contributions by Hart, Holmstrom, Klein,Williamson, and others. Although these contributions have been widely cited and much discussed, I have found it difficult to understand the commonalities, distinctions, and potential combinations of these seemingly familiar contributions. In this essay, therefore, I attempt to clarify these issues in three steps: I begin with informal summaries of the theories, then turn to simple but formal statements of each elemental theory, and finally nest the four elemental theories in an integrative framework.
 
In this essay, I define and compare elemental versions of four theories of the firm. These elemental theories are distilled from important contributions by Hart, Holmstrom, Klein,Williamson, and others. Although these contributions have been widely cited and much discussed, I have found it difficult to understand the commonalities, distinctions, and potential combinations of these seemingly familiar contributions. In this essay, therefore, I attempt to clarify these issues in three steps: I begin with informal summaries of the theories, then turn to simple but formal statements of each elemental theory, and finally nest the four elemental theories in an integrative framework.

Revision as of 19:52, 26 August 2013

Reference(s)

  • Gibbons, Robert (2005), "Four formal(izable) theories of the firm?", Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol. 58, pp.200-245. pdf
@article{gibbons2005four,
  title={Four formal (izable) theories of the firm?},
  author={Gibbons, Robert},
  journal={Journal of Economic Behavior \& Organization},
  volume={58},
  number={2},
  pages={200--245},
  year={2005},
  publisher={Elsevier}
}

Abstract

In this essay, I define and compare elemental versions of four theories of the firm. These elemental theories are distilled from important contributions by Hart, Holmstrom, Klein,Williamson, and others. Although these contributions have been widely cited and much discussed, I have found it difficult to understand the commonalities, distinctions, and potential combinations of these seemingly familiar contributions. In this essay, therefore, I attempt to clarify these issues in three steps: I begin with informal summaries of the theories, then turn to simple but formal statements of each elemental theory, and finally nest the four elemental theories in an integrative framework.