Difference between revisions of "Foster Haltiwanger Syverson (2008) - Reallocation Firm Turnover And Efficiency Selection On Productivity Or Profitability"
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Has title=Reallocation Firm Turnover And Efficiency Selection On Productivity Or Profitability | |Has title=Reallocation Firm Turnover And Efficiency Selection On Productivity Or Profitability | ||
|Has author= | |Has author= | ||
| − | |Has year= | + | |Has year=2008 |
|In journal= | |In journal= | ||
|In volume= | |In volume= | ||
Revision as of 13:19, 29 September 2020
| Article | |
|---|---|
| Has bibtex key | |
| Has article title | |
| Has year | 2008 |
| In journal | |
| In volume | |
| In number | |
| Has pages | |
| Has publisher | |
| © edegan.com, 2016 | |
- This page is referenced in The NBER Entrepreneurship Research Boot Camp Page
Reference(s)
- Foster, L., J. Haltiwanger, and C. Syverson (2008), "Reallocation, Firm Turnover and Efficiency: Selection on Productivity or Profitability", American Economic Review, March. pdf
Abstract
We investigate the nature of selection and productivity growth in industries where we observe producer-level quantities and prices separately. We show there are important differences between revenue and physical productivity. Because physical productivity is inversely correlated with price while revenue productivity is positively correlated with price, previous work linking (revenue- based) productivity to survival confounded the separate and opposing effects of technical efficiency and demand on survival, understating the true impacts of both. Further, we find that young producers charge lower prices than incumbents. Thus the literature understates new producers’ productivity advantages and entry’s contribution to aggregate productivity growth.
