174
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth Literature Review (view source)
Revision as of 17:27, 27 March 2017
, 17:27, 27 March 2017no edit summary
note = {Google-Books-ID: ML8c8YPvTvsC},
keywords = {Business \& Economics / Development / Economic Development, Business \& Economics / Economics / Microeconomics, Business \& Economics / Entrepreneurship, Business \& Economics / General}
The product market and the market for “ideas”: commercialization strategies for technology entrepreneurs
@article{gans_product_2003,
series = {Special {Issue} on {Technology} {Entrepreneurship} and {Contact} {Information} for corresponding authors},
title = {The product market and the market for “ideas”: commercialization strategies for technology entrepreneurs},
volume = {32},
issn = {0048-7333},
shorttitle = {The product market and the market for “ideas”},
url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733302001038},
doi = {10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00103-8},
abstract = {This paper presents a synthetic framework identifying the central drivers of start-up commercialization strategy and the implications of these drivers for industrial dynamics. We link strategy to the commercialization environment—the microeconomic and strategic conditions facing a firm that is translating an “idea” into a value proposition for customers. The framework addresses why technology entrepreneurs in some environments undermine established firms, while others cooperate with incumbents and reinforce existing market power. Our analysis suggests that competitive interaction between start-up innovators and established firms depends on the presence or absence of a “market for ideas”. By focusing on the operating requirements, efficiency, and institutions associated with markets for ideas, this framework holds several implications for the management of high-technology entrepreneurial firms.},
number = {2},
urldate = {2017-03-27},
journal = {Research Policy},
author = {Gans, Joshua S. and Stern, Scott},
month = feb,
year = {2003},
keywords = {Appropriability, Commercialization strategies, Ideas market, Product market, Technology entrepreneurs},
pages = {333--350},
file = {ScienceDirect Full Text PDF:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/BVZBMHTS/Gans and Stern - 2003 - The product market and the market for “ideas” com.pdf:application/pdf;ScienceDirect Snapshot:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/BR8CUQAE/S0048733302001038.html:text/html}
Clusters and entrepreneruship
@article{delgado_clusters_2010,
title = {Clusters and entrepreneurship},
volume = {10},
issn = {1468-2702},
url = {https://academic.oup.com/joeg/article/10/4/495/913653/Clusters-and-entrepreneurship},
doi = {10.1093/jeg/lbq010},
number = {4},
urldate = {2017-03-27},
journal = {Journal of Economic Geography},
author = {Delgado, Mercedes and Porter, Michael E. and Stern, Scott},
month = jul,
year = {2010},
pages = {495--518},
file = {Full Text PDF:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/9UJB7GDJ/Delgado et al. - 2010 - Clusters and entrepreneurship.pdf:application/pdf;Snapshot:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/SPMPZECB/Clusters-and-entrepreneurship.html:text/html}
New Challenge to America's prosperity
@book{porter_new_1999,
title = {new challenge to {America}'s prosperity},
isbn = {978-1-889866-21-5},
url = {http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=US201300034528},
language = {English},
urldate = {2017-03-27},
publisher = {Council on Competitiveness},
author = {Porter, Michael E. and 1947- and Stern, Scott and 1969-},
year = {1999},
file = {Snapshot:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/WEKHN8V3/search.html:text/html}
The Determinants of National Competitiveness
@techreport{delgado_determinants_2012,
type = {Working {Paper}},
title = {The {Determinants} of {National} {Competitiveness}},
url = {http://www.nber.org/papers/w18249},
abstract = {We define foundational competitiveness as the expected level of output per working-age individual that is supported by the overall quality of a country as a place to do business. The focus on output per potential worker, a broader measure of national productivity than output per current worker, reflects the dual role of workforce participation and output per worker in determining a nation's standard of living. Our framework highlights three broad and interrelated drivers of foundational competitiveness: social infrastructure and political institutions, monetary and fiscal policy, and the microeconomic environment. We estimate this framework using multiple data sets covering more than 130 countries over the 2001-2008 period. We find a positive and separate influence of each driver on output per potential worker. The microeconomic environment has a positive effect on output per potential worker even after controlling for historical legacies. Using our framework we define a new concept, global investment attractiveness, which is the cost of factor inputs relative to a country's competitiveness. This analysis reveals important insight into the economic trajectory of individual countries. Our framework also offers a novel methodology for the estimation of a theoretically grounded and empirically validated measure of national competitiveness.},
number = {18249},
urldate = {2017-03-27},
institution = {National Bureau of Economic Research},
author = {Delgado, Mercedes and Ketels, Christian and Porter, Michael E. and Stern, Scott},
month = jul,
year = {2012},
note = {DOI: 10.3386/w18249},
file = {NBER Full Text PDF:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/HXSAFKCF/Delgado et al. - 2012 - The Determinants of National Competitiveness.pdf:application/pdf}
Innovation Policy and the Economy
@book{jaffe_innovation_2001,
title = {Innovation {Policy} and the {Economy}},
isbn = {978-0-262-60041-5},
abstract = {This new annual series, sponsored by the National Bureau of Economic Research, will provide a forum for research on the interactions between public policy and the innovation process. Discussions will cover all types of policy that affect the ability of an economy to achieve scientific and technological progress or that affect the impact of science and technology on economic growth.},
language = {en},
publisher = {MIT Press},
author = {Jaffe, Adam B. and Lerner, Josh and Stern, Scott},
year = {2001},
note = {Google-Books-ID: Nc33ZS5nRa0C},
keywords = {Business \& Economics / Development / Economic Development, Business \& Economics / Economics / General, Technology \& Engineering / Industrial Technology, Technology \& Engineering / Nanotechnology \& MEMS}
The Government as Venture Capitalist: The Long-Run Effects of the SBIR Program
@techreport{lerner_government_1996,
type = {Working {Paper}},
title = {The {Government} as {Venture} {Capitalist}: {The} {Long}-{Run} {Effects} of the {SBIR} {Program}},
shorttitle = {The {Government} as {Venture} {Capitalist}},
url = {http://www.nber.org/papers/w5753},
abstract = {Public programs to provide early-stage financing to firms, particularly high-technology companies, have become commonplace in the United States and abroad. The long-run effectiveness of these programs, however, has attracted little empirical scrutiny. This paper examines the impact of the largest U.S. public venture capital initiative, the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) program, which has provided over \$6 billion to small high-technology firms between 1983 and 1995. Using a unique database" of awardees compiled by the U.S. General Accounting Office, I show that SBIR awardees grew significantly faster than a matched set of firms over a ten-year period. The positive effects of SBIR awards were confined to firms based in zip codes with substantial venture capital activity. The findings are consistent with both the corporate finance literature on capital constraints and the growth literature on the importance of localization effects.},
number = {5753},
urldate = {2017-03-27},
institution = {National Bureau of Economic Research},
author = {Lerner, Josh},
month = sep,
year = {1996},
note = {DOI: 10.3386/w5753},
file = {NBER Full Text PDF:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/EHHIB8W6/Lerner - 1996 - The Government as Venture Capitalist The Long-Run.pdf:application/pdf}
The Venture Capital Revolution
@article{gompers_venture_2001,
title = {The {Venture} {Capital} {Revolution}},
volume = {15},
issn = {0895-3309},
url = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/2696596},
number = {2},
urldate = {2017-03-27},
journal = {The Journal of Economic Perspectives},
author = {Gompers, Paul and Lerner, Josh},
year = {2001},
pages = {145--168}
Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation & Economic Growth
@incollection{kortum_does_2001,
series = {Advances in the {Study} of {Entrepreneurship}, {Innovation} \& {Economic} {Growth}},
title = {Does venture capital spur innovation?},
volume = {13},
url = {http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1016/S1048-4736%2801%2913003-1},
number = {13},
urldate = {2017-03-27},
booktitle = {Entrepreneurial inputs and outcomes: {New} studies of entrepreneurship in the {United} {States}},
publisher = {Emerald Group Publishing Limited},
author = {Kortum, Samuel and Lerner, Josh},
month = jan,
year = {2001},
note = {DOI: 10.1016/S1048-4736(01)13003-1
DOI: 10.1016/S1048-4736(01)13003-1},
pages = {1--44},
file = {Snapshot:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/P8SJ5DJ9/S1048-4736(01)13003-1.html:text/html}
What Drives Venture Capital Fundraising?
@techreport{gompers_what_1999,
type = {Working {Paper}},
title = {What {Drives} {Venture} {Capital} {Fundraising}?},
url = {http://www.nber.org/papers/w6906},
abstract = {We examine the determinants of venture capital fundraising in the U.S. over the past twenty-five years. We study industry aggregate, state-level, and firm-specific fundraising to determine if macroeconomic, regulatory, or performance factors affect venture capital activity. We find that shifts in demand for venture capital appear to have a positive and important impact on commitments to new venture capital funds. Commitments by taxable and tax-exempt investors seem equally sensitive to changes in capital gains tax rates that decreases in capital gains tax rates increase the demand for venture capital as more workers are incented to become entrepreneurs. Aggregate and state level venture fundraising are positively affected by easing of pension investment restrictions as well as industrial and academic R\&D expenditures. Fund performance and reputation also lead to greater fundraising by venture organizations.},
number = {6906},
urldate = {2017-03-27},
institution = {National Bureau of Economic Research},
author = {Gompers, Paul A. and Lerner, Josh},
month = jan,
year = {1999},
note = {DOI: 10.3386/w6906},
file = {NBER Full Text PDF:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/T95N8SZ9/Gompers and Lerner - 1999 - What Drives Venture Capital Fundraising.pdf:application/pdf}
Does venture capital spur innovation?
@incollection{kortum_does_2001-1,
series = {Advances in the {Study} of {Entrepreneurship}, {Innovation} \& {Economic} {Growth}},
title = {Does venture capital spur innovation?},
volume = {13},
url = {http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1016/S1048-4736%2801%2913003-1},
number = {13},
urldate = {2017-03-27},
booktitle = {Entrepreneurial inputs and outcomes: {New} studies of entrepreneurship in the {United} {States}},
publisher = {Emerald Group Publishing Limited},
author = {Kortum, Samuel and Lerner, Josh},
month = jan,
year = {2001},
note = {DOI: 10.1016/S1048-4736(01)13003-1
DOI: 10.1016/S1048-4736(01)13003-1},
pages = {1--44},
file = {Snapshot:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/Z27E3MFC/S1048-4736(01)13003-1.html:text/html}
An analysis of compensation in the U.S. venture capital partnership by Paul Gompers
@article{gompers_analysis_1999,
title = {An analysis of compensation in the {U}.{S}. venture capital partnership1},
volume = {51},
issn = {0304-405X},
url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304405X98000427},
doi = {10.1016/S0304-405X(98)00042-7},
abstract = {Venture capital limited partnerships are an attractive arena to study cross-sectional and time-series variations in compensation schemes. We empirically examine 419 partnerships. The compensation of new and smaller funds displays considerably less sensitivity to performance and less variation than that of other funds. The fixed base component of compensation is higher for younger and smaller firms. We observe no relation between incentive compensation and performance. Our evidence is consistent with a learning model, in which the pay of new venture capitalists is less sensitive to performance because reputational concerns induce them to work hard.},
number = {1},
urldate = {2017-03-27},
journal = {Journal of Financial Economics},
author = {Gompers, Paul and Lerner, Josh},
month = jan,
year = {1999},
keywords = {Contract, Limited partnership, Private equity, Venture capital},
pages = {3--44},
file = {ScienceDirect Full Text PDF:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/7IEC7R6C/Gompers and Lerner - 1999 - An analysis of compensation in the U.S. venture ca.pdf:application/pdf;ScienceDirect Snapshot:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/HV9JFZX6/S0304405X98000427.html:text/html}
Boulevard of Broken Dreams: Why Public Efforts to Boost Entrepreneurship and Venture Capital Have Failed--and What to Do About It
@book{lerner_boulevard_2009,
title = {Boulevard of {Broken} {Dreams}: {Why} {Public} {Efforts} to {Boost} {Entrepreneurship} and {Venture} {Capital} {Have} {Failed}--and {What} to {Do} {About} {It}},
isbn = {978-1-4008-3163-0},
shorttitle = {Boulevard of {Broken} {Dreams}},
abstract = {Silicon Valley, Singapore, Tel Aviv--the global hubs of entrepreneurial activity--all bear the marks of government investment. Yet, for every public intervention that spurs entrepreneurial activity, there are many failed efforts that waste untold billions in taxpayer dollars. When has governmental sponsorship succeeded in boosting growth, and when has it fallen terribly short? Should the government be involved in such undertakings at all? Boulevard of Broken Dreams is the first extensive look at the ways governments have supported entrepreneurs and venture capitalists across decades and continents. Josh Lerner, one of the foremost experts in the field, provides valuable insights into why some public initiatives work while others are hobbled by pitfalls, and he offers suggestions for how public ventures should be implemented in the future. Discussing the complex history of Silicon Valley and other pioneering centers of venture capital, Lerner uncovers the extent of government influence in prompting growth. He examines the public strategies used to advance new ventures, points to the challenges of these endeavors, and reveals the common flaws undermining far too many programs--poor design, a lack of understanding for the entrepreneurial process, and implementation problems. Lerner explains why governments cannot dictate how venture markets evolve, and why they must balance their positions as catalysts with an awareness of their limited ability to stimulate the entrepreneurial sector. As governments worldwide seek to spur economic growth in ever more aggressive ways, Boulevard of Broken Dreams offers an important caution. The book argues for a careful approach to government support of entrepreneurial activities, so that the mistakes of earlier efforts are not repeated.},
language = {en},
publisher = {Princeton University Press},
author = {Lerner, Josh},
month = sep,
year = {2009},
note = {Google-Books-ID: cv10iRcUXVgC},
keywords = {Business \& Economics / Entrepreneurship, Business \& Economics / Finance / General, Political Science / Public Policy / Economic Policy}
Special Issue on Technology Entrepreneurship and Contact Information for corresponding authors
@article{gans_product_2003-1,
series = {Special {Issue} on {Technology} {Entrepreneurship} and {Contact} {Information} for corresponding authors},
title = {The product market and the market for “ideas”: commercialization strategies for technology entrepreneurs},
volume = {32},
issn = {0048-7333},
shorttitle = {The product market and the market for “ideas”},
url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733302001038},
doi = {10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00103-8},
abstract = {This paper presents a synthetic framework identifying the central drivers of start-up commercialization strategy and the implications of these drivers for industrial dynamics. We link strategy to the commercialization environment—the microeconomic and strategic conditions facing a firm that is translating an “idea” into a value proposition for customers. The framework addresses why technology entrepreneurs in some environments undermine established firms, while others cooperate with incumbents and reinforce existing market power. Our analysis suggests that competitive interaction between start-up innovators and established firms depends on the presence or absence of a “market for ideas”. By focusing on the operating requirements, efficiency, and institutions associated with markets for ideas, this framework holds several implications for the management of high-technology entrepreneurial firms.},
number = {2},
urldate = {2017-03-27},
journal = {Research Policy},
author = {Gans, Joshua S. and Stern, Scott},
month = feb,
year = {2003},
keywords = {Appropriability, Commercialization strategies, Ideas market, Product market, Technology entrepreneurs},
pages = {333--350},
file = {ScienceDirect Full Text PDF:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/KA9BZJQ2/Gans and Stern - 2003 - The product market and the market for “ideas” com.pdf:application/pdf;ScienceDirect Snapshot:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/6HDNNZFW/S0048733302001038.html:text/html}
Private Equity and Long-Run Investment: The Case of Innovation
@article{lerner_private_2011,
title = {Private {Equity} and {Long}-{Run} {Investment}: {The} {Case} of {Innovation}},
volume = {66},
issn = {1540-6261},
shorttitle = {Private {Equity} and {Long}-{Run} {Investment}},
url = {http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01639.x/abstract},
doi = {10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01639.x},
abstract = {A long-standing controversy is whether leveraged buyouts (LBOs) relieve managers from short-term pressures from public shareholders, or whether LBO funds themselves sacrifice long-term growth to boost short-term performance. We examine one form of long-run activity, namely, investments in innovation as measured by patenting activity. Based on 472 LBO transactions, we find no evidence that LBOs sacrifice long-term investments. LBO firm patents are more cited (a proxy for economic importance), show no shifts in the fundamental nature of the research, and become more concentrated in important areas of companies' innovative portfolios.},
language = {en},
number = {2},
urldate = {2017-03-27},
journal = {The Journal of Finance},
author = {Lerner, Josh and Sorensen, Morten and Strömberg, Per},
month = apr,
year = {2011},
pages = {445--477},
file = {Full Text PDF:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/FWCUXVTH/Lerner et al. - 2011 - Private Equity and Long-Run Investment The Case o.pdf:application/pdf;Snapshot:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/NTXHVB2K/abstract.html:text/html}
Opportunities and Entrepreneurship
@article{eckhardt_opportunities_2003,
title = {Opportunities and {Entrepreneurship}},
volume = {29},
issn = {0149-2063},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014920630302900304},
doi = {10.1177/014920630302900304},
abstract = {This article extends and elaborates the perspective on entrepreneurship articulated by Shane and Venkataraman (2000) and Venkataraman (1997) by explaining in more detail the role of opportunities in the entrepreneurial process. In particular, the article explains the importance of examining entrepreneurship through a disequilibrium framework that focuses on the characteristics and existence of entrepreneurial opportunities. In addition, the article describes several typologies of opportunities and their implications for understanding entrepreneurship.},
language = {en},
number = {3},
urldate = {2017-03-27},
journal = {Journal of Management},
author = {Eckhardt, Jonathan T. and Shane, Scott A.},
month = jun,
year = {2003},
pages = {333--349},
file = {SAGE PDF Full Text:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/BM6E5PW7/Eckhardt and Shane - 2003 - Opportunities and Entrepreneurship.pdf:application/pdf}
Academic Entrepreneurship: University Spinoffs and Wealth Creation
@book{shane_academic_2004,
title = {Academic {Entrepreneurship}: {University} {Spinoffs} and {Wealth} {Creation}},
isbn = {978-1-84376-982-8},
shorttitle = {Academic {Entrepreneurship}},
abstract = {In this unique and timely volume, Scott Shane systematically explains the formation of university spinoff companies and their role in the commercialization of university technology and wealth creation in the United States and elsewhere. The importance of university spinoff activity is discussed and the historical development of university spinoff ventures is traced over time.},
language = {en},
publisher = {Edward Elgar Publishing},
author = {Shane, Scott Andrew},
month = jan,
year = {2004},
note = {Google-Books-ID: fMRGAgAAQBAJ},
keywords = {Business \& Economics / General}
Technological Opportunities and New Firm Creation
@article{shane_technological_2001,
title = {Technological {Opportunities} and {New} {Firm} {Creation}},
volume = {47},
issn = {0025-1909},
url = {http://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/mnsc.47.2.205.9837},
doi = {10.1287/mnsc.47.2.205.9837},
abstract = {Research on the creation of new high-technology companies has typically focused either on industry-level factors such as market structure and technology regime or on individual-level factors such as the work experience of entrepreneurs. This study complements these approaches by examining the effect of technological opportunities on firm formation. In particular, the study shows that the probability that an invention will be commercialized through firm formation is influenced by its importance, radicalness, and patent scope.},
number = {2},
urldate = {2017-03-27},
journal = {Management Science},
author = {Shane, Scott},
month = feb,
year = {2001},
pages = {205--220},
file = {Full Text PDF:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/NB3TMCIX/Shane - 2001 - Technological Opportunities and New Firm Creation.pdf:application/pdf;Snapshot:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/XBGW3B4J/mnsc.47.2.205.html:text/html}
Empirical studies of innovation and market structure
@article{cohen_chapter_1989,
title = {Chapter 18 {Empirical} studies of innovation and market structure},
volume = {2},
issn = {1573-448X},
url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1573448X89020066},
doi = {10.1016/S1573-448X(89)02006-6},
abstract = {This chapter discusses the perceptible movement of empirical scholars from a narrow concern with the role of firm size and market concentration toward a broader consideration of the fundamental determinants of technical change in industry. Although tastes, technological opportunity, and appropriability conditions themselves are subject to change over time, particularly in response to radical innovations that alter the technological regime, these conditions are reasonably assumed to determine inter-industry differences in innovative activity over relatively long periods. Although a substantial body of descriptive evidence has begun to accumulate on the way the nature and effects of demand, opportunity, and appropriability differ across industries, the absence of suitable data constrains progress in many areas. It has been observed that much of the empirical understanding of innovation derives not from the estimation of econometric models but from the use of other empirical methods. Many of the most credible empirical regularities have been established not by estimating and testing elaborate optimization models with published data but by the painstaking collection of original data, usually in the form of responses to relatively simple questions.},
urldate = {2017-03-27},
journal = {Handbook of Industrial Organization},
author = {Cohen, Wesley M. and Levin, Richard C.},
month = jan,
year = {1989},
pages = {1059--1107},
file = {ScienceDirect Snapshot:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/SGM2ERHI/S1573448X89020066.html:text/html}
Entrepreneurship as Innovation
@techreport{schumpeter_entrepreneurship_2000,
address = {Rochester, NY},
type = {{SSRN} {Scholarly} {Paper}},
title = {Entrepreneurship as {Innovation}},
url = {https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1512266},
abstract = {The chief characteristics of the entrepreneur are identified, one of which is the ability to combine already existing resources in creative ways. Distinguishing},
number = {ID 1512266},
urldate = {2017-03-27},
institution = {Social Science Research Network},
author = {Schumpeter, Joseph A.},
year = {2000},
keywords = {Capitalism, Creativity, Individual traits, Industrial organization, Innovation process, Leadership, Motivation, Personal success},
file = {Snapshot:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/3Q3Z47HA/papers.html:text/html}
The Politics and Aesthetics of Entrepreneurship: A Fourth Movements in Entrepreneurship Book
@book{hjorth_politics_2010,
title = {The {Politics} and {Aesthetics} of {Entrepreneurship}: {A} {Fourth} {Movements} in {Entrepreneurship} {Book}},
isbn = {978-1-84844-607-6},
shorttitle = {The {Politics} and {Aesthetics} of {Entrepreneurship}},
abstract = {Stylish, bold, fiery, and full of zest, this book could well have been called Embodying Entrepreneurship . . . for perhaps the first time, we have a cultured, scholarly, in-the-flesh treatment of entrepreneurial life. Ranging from striptease to de Sade, t},
language = {en},
publisher = {Edward Elgar Publishing},
author = {Hjorth, Daniel and Steyaert, Chris},
month = jan,
year = {2010},
note = {Google-Books-ID: \_CI5K8PG1TEC},
keywords = {Business \& Economics / Entrepreneurship}
The Politics and Aesthetics of Entrepreneurship: A Fourth Movements in Entrepreneurship Book
@book{hjorth_politics_2010-1,
title = {The {Politics} and {Aesthetics} of {Entrepreneurship}: {A} {Fourth} {Movements} in {Entrepreneurship} {Book}},
isbn = {978-1-84844-607-6},
shorttitle = {The {Politics} and {Aesthetics} of {Entrepreneurship}},
abstract = {Stylish, bold, fiery, and full of zest, this book could well have been called Embodying Entrepreneurship . . . for perhaps the first time, we have a cultured, scholarly, in-the-flesh treatment of entrepreneurial life. Ranging from striptease to de Sade, t},
language = {en},
publisher = {Edward Elgar Publishing},
author = {Hjorth, Daniel and Steyaert, Chris},
month = jan,
year = {2010},
note = {Google-Books-ID: \_CI5K8PG1TEC},
keywords = {Business \& Economics / Entrepreneurship}
Urban Entrepreneurship and the Sunbelt Frontier
@article{angel_zenith_1980,
title = {{ZENITH} {REVISITED}: {URBAN} {ENTREPRENEURSHIP} {AND} {THE} {SUNBELT} {FRONTIER}},
volume = {61},
issn = {0038-4941},
shorttitle = {{ZENITH} {REVISITED}},
url = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/42860763},
number = {3/4},
urldate = {2017-03-27},
journal = {Social Science Quarterly},
author = {ANGEL, WILLIAM D.},
year = {1980},
pages = {434--445}
Entrepreneurship and the City
@techreport{glaeser_entrepreneurship_2007,
type = {Working {Paper}},
title = {Entrepreneurship and the {City}},
url = {http://www.nber.org/papers/w13551},
abstract = {Why do levels of entrepreneurship differ across America's cities? This paper presents basic facts on two measures of entrepreneurship: the self-employment rate and the number of small firms. Both of these measures are correlated with urban success, suggesting that more entrepreneurial cities are more successful. There is considerable variation in the self-employment rate across metropolitan areas, but about one-half of this heterogeneity can be explained by demographic and industrial variation. Self-employment is particularly associated with abundant, older citizens and with the presence of input suppliers. Conversely, small firm size and employment growth due to unaffiliated new establishments is associated most strongly with the presence of input suppliers and an appropriate labor force. I also find support for the Chinitz (1961) hypothesis that entrepreneurship is linked to a large number of small firms in supplying industries. Finally, there is a strong connection between area-level education and entrepreneurship.},
number = {13551},
urldate = {2017-03-27},
institution = {National Bureau of Economic Research},
author = {Glaeser, Edward L.},
month = oct,
year = {2007},
note = {DOI: 10.3386/w13551},
file = {NBER Full Text PDF:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/GGUKUU84/Glaeser - 2007 - Entrepreneurship and the City.pdf:application/pdf}
Entrepreneurship and welfare
@article{tamvada_entrepreneurship_2010,
title = {Entrepreneurship and welfare},
volume = {34},
issn = {0921-898X, 1573-0913},
url = {https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11187-009-9195-5},
doi = {10.1007/s11187-009-9195-5},
abstract = {Here, I examine returns to entrepreneurship using a standard measure of welfare, the per-capita consumption expenditure. This analysis, using quantile regressions, reveals the existence of a welfare hierarchy in occupations. The results suggest that, across the welfare distribution, entrepreneurs who employ others have the highest returns in terms of consumption, while those entrepreneurs who work for themselves, that is, self-employed individuals, have slightly lower returns than the salaried employees. However, self-employment entails higher returns than casual labor and a relative escape from poverty.},
language = {en},
number = {1},
urldate = {2017-03-27},
journal = {Small Business Economics},
author = {Tamvada, Jagannadha Pawan},
month = jan,
year = {2010},
pages = {65--79},
file = {Full Text PDF:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/XCZDSSXS/Tamvada - 2010 - Entrepreneurship and welfare.pdf:application/pdf;Snapshot:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/52GUIKIW/s11187-009-9195-5.html:text/html}
The interaction of entrepreneurship and institutions
@article{henrekson_interaction_2011,
title = {The interaction of entrepreneurship and institutions},
volume = {7},
issn = {1744-1382, 1744-1374},
url = {https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-institutional-economics/article/interaction-of-entrepreneurship-and-institutions/DD9AF1A1BFA6DC0714066B09E9D52E0C},
doi = {10.1017/S1744137410000342},
abstract = {Abstract:Previous research, notably Baumol (1990), has highlighted the role of institutions in channeling entrepreneurial supply into productive, unproductive, or destructive activities. However, entrepreneurship is not only influenced by institutions – entrepreneurs often help shape institutions themselves. The bilateral causal relation between entrepreneurs and institutions is examined in this paper. Entrepreneurs affect institutions in at least three ways. Entrepreneurship abiding by existing institutions is occasionally disruptive enough to challenge the foundations of prevailing institutions. Entrepreneurs sometimes have the opportunity to evade institutions, which tends to undermine the effectiveness of the institutions, or cause institutions to change for the better. Lastly, entrepreneurs can directly alter institutions through innovative political entrepreneurship. Like business entrepreneurship, innovative political activity may be productive or unproductive, depending on the incentives facing entrepreneurs.},
number = {1},
urldate = {2017-03-27},
journal = {Journal of Institutional Economics},
author = {Henrekson, Magnus and Sanandaji, Tino},
month = mar,
year = {2011},
pages = {47--75},
file = {Snapshot:/Users/tonimasaleh/Library/Application Support/Zotero/Profiles/ujmvea1t.default/zotero/storage/RMIM2R2C/DD9AF1A1BFA6DC0714066B09E9D52E0C.html:text/html}
