Difference between revisions of "Ellison Fudenberg Mobius (2004) - Competing Auctions"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Article | {{Article | ||
|Has page=Ellison Fudenberg Mobius (2004) - Competing Auctions | |Has page=Ellison Fudenberg Mobius (2004) - Competing Auctions | ||
| − | |Has title=Competing Auctions | + | |Has bibtex key= |
| + | |Has article title=Competing Auctions | ||
|Has author=Ellison Fudenberg Mobius | |Has author=Ellison Fudenberg Mobius | ||
|Has year=2004 | |Has year=2004 | ||
Latest revision as of 19:14, 29 September 2020
| Article | |
|---|---|
| Has bibtex key | |
| Has article title | Competing Auctions |
| Has author | Ellison Fudenberg Mobius |
| Has year | 2004 |
| In journal | |
| In volume | |
| In number | |
| Has pages | |
| Has publisher | |
| © edegan.com, 2016 | |
Reference(s)
Ellison, Glenn, Fudenberg, Drew, and Möbius, Markus (2004), "Competing Auctions", Journal of the European Economic Association, Mar, Vol. 2 Issue 1, p30-66 link pdf
Abstract
This paper examines a simple model of competing auction sites to give some insights into the concentration of auction markets. In our model, there are B ex-ante identical buyers, each with unit demand, and S sellers, each with a single unit of the good to sell and a reservation value of zero. At the start of the model, buyers and sellers simultaneously choose between two possible locations. Buyers then learn their private values for the good, and a uniform-price auction is held at each location. This is a very stark model, but we believe that it provides some useful insights, and that it serves as a benchmark case for richer and more realistic models.
A random paper
