Difference between revisions of "Economic definition of true love"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Ed |
imported>Ed |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
Let <math>T</math> denote the set of pairs of individuals who have True Love, such that: | Let <math>T</math> denote the set of pairs of individuals who have True Love, such that: | ||
| − | :<math>\forall\{i,j\} \in T: \quad (i \succ_j h \quad \forall h \ne i) \and (j \succ_i \quad \forall h \ne j), \ | + | :<math>\forall\{i,j\} \in T: \quad (i \succ_j h \quad \forall h \ne i) \and (j \succ_i h \quad \forall h \ne j), \quad h \in H \cap \{\emptyset\}</math> |
Revision as of 17:05, 25 February 2012
Current Availability
I'm afraid that Ed is currently unavailable for dating at this time. Exceptions to this can be made if you have a Math(s) Ph.D.
That said, if you genuinely believe:
- [math]p\left(You \cap The\,One \ne \{\empty\}\,|\,First\,Glance\right) \gg 0[/math]
then please stop by my office (F533) at the Haas School of Business (map) at your earliest convenience.
Future Availability
Please check back for updates.
True Love
Definition
Let [math]H[/math] denote the set of all entities, perhaps Humans, though we might also include dogs, cats and horses, according to historical precedent.
Let [math]T[/math] denote the set of pairs of individuals who have True Love, such that:
- [math]\forall\{i,j\} \in T: \quad (i \succ_j h \quad \forall h \ne i) \and (j \succ_i h \quad \forall h \ne j), \quad h \in H \cap \{\emptyset\}[/math]
