Difference between revisions of "Baye Morgan Scholten (2006) - Information Search and Price Dispersion"

From edegan.com
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Ed
imported>Ed
(No difference)

Revision as of 21:14, 25 January 2010

  • This page is part of a series under PHDBA279B

Key Reference(s)

Introduction

Baye et al. (2006) provides a survey of models of search and clearinghouse that exhibit price dispersion. The survey is undertaken through two specializable frameworks, one for search and one for cleaninghouses, which are then adapted to show the key results from the literature. There are a number of equivalent results across the two frameworks.

Search Theoretic Models of Price Dispersion

The general framework used through-out is as follows:

  • A continuum of price-setting firms with unit measure compete selling an homogenous product
  • A mass [math]\mu[/math] is interested in purchasing the product
  • Consumers have quasi-linear utility (i.e. additively-seperable in income):
    [math]u(q) + y\,[/math] where [math]y\,[/math] is a numeraire good
  • The indirect utility of consumers is:
    [math]V(p,M) = v(p) + M\,[/math] where [math]v(\cdot)\,[/math] in nonincreasing in [math]p\,[/math], and [math]M\,[/math] is income.
  • By Roy's identity:
[math]q(p) \equiv -v'(p)\,[/math].
  • There is a search cost [math]c\,[/math] per price quote
  • The customer purchases after [math]n\,[/math] price quotes
  • The final indirect utility of the customer is:
    [math]V(p,M) = v(p) + M - cn\,[/math]

A note on the derivation of demand

Recall that [math]M=e(p,u)\,[/math], so that [math]v(e(p,u),p)=u\,[/math] when the expenditure function is evaluated at [math]p\,[/math] and [math]u\,[/math].

Taking the derivitive with respect to [math]p\,[/math]:

[math]\frac{d(v(M,p))}{dp} = \frac{dv(M,p)}{dm} \cdot \frac{dM}{dp} + \frac{dv(M,p)}{dp} = 0,\,[/math] where [math]\frac{dM}{dp} = \frac{de(p,u)}{dp}\,[/math].

[math]\therefore q(m,p) = \frac{de(p,u)}{dp} = -\frac{\frac{dv(M,p)}{dp}}{\frac{dv(M,p)}{dm}}\,[/math]

[math]\therefore q(m,p) = -\frac{d}{dp(v(p))}\,[/math] in our case.

The Stigler (1961) Model

The first special case examined in the general framework is that of Stigler (1961):

  1. Each consumer purchases [math]K \ge 1\,[/math] units, so that [math]q(p) = -v'(p) = K\,[/math]
  2. Fixed sample search is used
  3. The distribution of firms' prices is given exogenously by the non-degenerate CDF [math]F(p)\,[/math] on [math][\underline{p}, \overline{p}]\,[/math].
Fixed sample search
In a fixed sample search the consumer commits to conducting [math]n\,[/math]  searches
and then buys from the firm offering the lowest price.

The consumer seeks to minimize the expected cost (purchase + search) given by:

[math]E(C) = K E\(p_min^(n)\) + cn\,[/math] where [math]\mathbb{E}\(p_min^(n)\) = \mathbb{E}\(min\{p_1,p_2,\ldots,p_n\}\) \,[/math] The distribution of the lowest [math]n\,[/math] draws is: [math]F_{min}^{(n)}(p) = 1 - (1-F(p))^n\,[/math]

[math] \,[/math]