Difference between revisions of "Acemoglu and Pischke (1998)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Bo (New page: * What is the author's hypothesis? * How does the author test the hypothesis? * How does the author rule out alternative hypotheses? * How might these tests be run if one had quantitati...) |
imported>Bo |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | Theory Questions: | ||
* What is the author's hypothesis? | * What is the author's hypothesis? | ||
* How does the author test the hypothesis? | * How does the author test the hypothesis? | ||
| Line 4: | Line 5: | ||
* How might these tests be run if one had quantitative evidence? | * How might these tests be run if one had quantitative evidence? | ||
* What problems might arise in this quantitative analysis? | * What problems might arise in this quantitative analysis? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Empirical Questions: | ||
| + | * What's the author's hypothesis? | ||
| + | * How it is tested? | ||
| + | * What do the tests achieve? | ||
| + | * How could the tests be improved? | ||
| + | * What are the tests' strengths and weaknesses? | ||
| + | * Can you think of any alternative empirical tests? | ||
Revision as of 13:14, 2 June 2011
Theory Questions:
- What is the author's hypothesis?
- How does the author test the hypothesis?
- How does the author rule out alternative hypotheses?
- How might these tests be run if one had quantitative evidence?
- What problems might arise in this quantitative analysis?
Empirical Questions:
- What's the author's hypothesis?
- How it is tested?
- What do the tests achieve?
- How could the tests be improved?
- What are the tests' strengths and weaknesses?
- Can you think of any alternative empirical tests?
