Difference between revisions of "La Porta et al (2008)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Article | {{Article | ||
|Has page=La Porta et al (2008) | |Has page=La Porta et al (2008) | ||
| − | |Has title= | + | |Has bibtex key= |
| − | |Has author= | + | |Has article title= |
| + | |Has author=La Porta et al | ||
|Has year=2008 | |Has year=2008 | ||
|In journal= | |In journal= | ||
Latest revision as of 18:15, 29 September 2020
Theory Questions:
- What is the author's hypothesis?
- How does the author test the hypothesis?
- How does the author rule out alternative hypotheses?
- How might these tests be run if one had quantitative evidence?
- What problems might arise in this quantitative analysis?
| Article | |
|---|---|
| Has bibtex key | |
| Has article title | |
| Has author | La Porta et al |
| Has year | 2008 |
| In journal | |
| In volume | |
| In number | |
| Has pages | |
| Has publisher | |
| © edegan.com, 2016 | |
Empirical Questions:
- What's the author's hypothesis?
- How it is tested?
- What do the tests achieve?
- How could the tests be improved?
- What are the tests' strengths and weaknesses?
- Can you think of any alternative empirical tests?
