Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Foster Haltiwanger Syverson (2008) - Reallocation Firm Turnover And Efficiency Selection On Productivity Or Profitability (view source)
Revision as of 20:05, 26 June 2011
, 20:05, 26 June 2011New page: *This page is referenced in The NBER Entrepreneurship Research Boot Camp Page ==Reference(s)== *Foster, L., J....
*This page is referenced in [[Entrepreneurship_Research_Boot_Camp#Productivity_and_Entrepreneurship | The NBER Entrepreneurship Research Boot Camp Page]]
==Reference(s)==
*Foster, L., J. Haltiwanger, and C. Syverson (2008), "Reallocation, Firm Turnover and Efficiency: Selection on Productivity or Profitability", American Economic Review, March. [http://www.edegan.com/pdfs/Foster%20Haltiwanger%20Syverson%20(2008)%20-%20Reallocation%20Firm%20Turnover%20And%20Efficiency%20Selection%20On%20Productivity%20Or%20Profitability.pdf pdf]
==Abstract==
We investigate the nature of selection and productivity growth in industries where we observe producer-level quantities and prices separately. We show there are important differences between revenue and physical productivity. Because physical productivity is inversely correlated with price while revenue productivity is positively correlated with price, previous work linking (revenue- based) productivity to survival confounded the separate and opposing effects of technical efficiency and demand on survival, understating the true impacts of both. Further, we find that young producers charge lower prices than incumbents. Thus the literature understates new producers’ productivity advantages and entry’s contribution to aggregate productivity growth.
==Reference(s)==
*Foster, L., J. Haltiwanger, and C. Syverson (2008), "Reallocation, Firm Turnover and Efficiency: Selection on Productivity or Profitability", American Economic Review, March. [http://www.edegan.com/pdfs/Foster%20Haltiwanger%20Syverson%20(2008)%20-%20Reallocation%20Firm%20Turnover%20And%20Efficiency%20Selection%20On%20Productivity%20Or%20Profitability.pdf pdf]
==Abstract==
We investigate the nature of selection and productivity growth in industries where we observe producer-level quantities and prices separately. We show there are important differences between revenue and physical productivity. Because physical productivity is inversely correlated with price while revenue productivity is positively correlated with price, previous work linking (revenue- based) productivity to survival confounded the separate and opposing effects of technical efficiency and demand on survival, understating the true impacts of both. Further, we find that young producers charge lower prices than incumbents. Thus the literature understates new producers’ productivity advantages and entry’s contribution to aggregate productivity growth.
