133
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Who enters, where and why? by Aviad Pe'er
@article{peer_who_2008,
title = {Who enters, where and why? {The} influence of capabilities and initial resource endowments on the location choices of de novo enterprises},
volume = {6},
issn = {1476-1270},
shorttitle = {Who enters, where and why?},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127008090007},
doi = {10.1177/1476127008090007},
abstract = {Some geographical locations have characteristics that create opportunities for de novo enterprises, but not all new firms can access the benefits presented by a potential location. The ability of new firms to appropriate benefit and avoid risk depends on the resources that entrepreneurs can marshal for their enterprise. This article develops a model of the interplay between the attributes of de novo entrants and their founding locations. The model assumes that de novo entrants tend to appear in the region where their founders live, but that founders choose among locations within their regions.The test of the model, using data on all de novo entrants in the Canadian manufacturing sector during 1984—98, reveals that entrants with greater resource and capability endowments are more likely to locate in areas with an agglomeration of similar firms, but this effect reverses at high endowment levels. Additionally, larger entrants are less likely to locate in areas characterized by intense local competition and potential entry deterrence, while smaller and well-endowed entrants tend to locate in areas where entry barriers are lower and asset turnover higher. These findings suggest that entrants choose locations strategically within their founding regions.They also indicate that the strategic imperatives of de novo entrants differ significantly from those of geographically diversifying firms, and thus suggest amendments to theories of location choice when modeling the decisions of new ventures.},
language = {en},
number = {2},
urldate = {2017-10-31},
journal = {Strategic Organization},
author = {Pe'er, Aviad and Vertinsky, Ilan and King, Andrew},
month = may,
year = {2008},
pages = {119--149}
Are all startups affected similarly by clusters by Aviad Pe'er and Thomas Keil
@article{peer_are_2013,
title = {Are all startups affected similarly by clusters? {Agglomeration}, competition, firm heterogeneity, and survival},
volume = {28},
issn = {0883-9026},
shorttitle = {Are all startups affected similarly by clusters?},
url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883902612000626},
doi = {10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.03.004},
abstract = {Are all startups similarly affected by the survival benefits and drawbacks of locating in geographic clusters? In this paper, we argue that prior theorizing may have missed important contingencies that affect whether a startup experiences the benefits and costs of locating in a cluster. In particular, while the local levels of skilled labor, suppliers, and purchasers have a beneficial influence and local competition has a detrimental influence on startup survival, these relationships are moderated by heterogeneity in firms' resources and capabilities. We find support for these arguments using a dataset covering the early life of all independent startups in the Canadian manufacturing sector from 1984 to 1998.},
number = {3},
urldate = {2017-10-31},
journal = {Journal of Business Venturing},
author = {Pe'er, Aviad and Keil, Thomas},
month = may,
year = {2013},
keywords = {Agglomeration, Capability, Cluster, Resource, Survival},
pages = {354--372}
Startup Density Literature Review (view source)
Revision as of 13:48, 31 October 2017
, 13:48, 31 October 2017no edit summary
}}
Below is a list of citations I have gathered looking up key words related to startup density, clustering, and agglomeration.
Are all startups affected similarly by clusters by Aviad Pe'er and Thomas Keil
@article{peer_are_2013,
title = {Are all startups affected similarly by clusters? {Agglomeration}, competition, firm heterogeneity, and survival},
volume = {28},
issn = {0883-9026},
shorttitle = {Are all startups affected similarly by clusters?},
url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883902612000626},
doi = {10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.03.004},
abstract = {Are all startups similarly affected by the survival benefits and drawbacks of locating in geographic clusters? In this paper, we argue that prior theorizing may have missed important contingencies that affect whether a startup experiences the benefits and costs of locating in a cluster. In particular, while the local levels of skilled labor, suppliers, and purchasers have a beneficial influence and local competition has a detrimental influence on startup survival, these relationships are moderated by heterogeneity in firms' resources and capabilities. We find support for these arguments using a dataset covering the early life of all independent startups in the Canadian manufacturing sector from 1984 to 1998.},
number = {3},
urldate = {2017-10-31},
journal = {Journal of Business Venturing},
author = {Pe'er, Aviad and Keil, Thomas},
month = may,
year = {2013},
keywords = {Agglomeration, Capability, Cluster, Resource, Survival},
pages = {354--372}
Who enters, where and why? by Aviad Pe'er
@article{peer_who_2008,
title = {Who enters, where and why? {The} influence of capabilities and initial resource endowments on the location choices of de novo enterprises},
volume = {6},
issn = {1476-1270},
shorttitle = {Who enters, where and why?},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127008090007},
doi = {10.1177/1476127008090007},
abstract = {Some geographical locations have characteristics that create opportunities for de novo enterprises, but not all new firms can access the benefits presented by a potential location. The ability of new firms to appropriate benefit and avoid risk depends on the resources that entrepreneurs can marshal for their enterprise. This article develops a model of the interplay between the attributes of de novo entrants and their founding locations. The model assumes that de novo entrants tend to appear in the region where their founders live, but that founders choose among locations within their regions.The test of the model, using data on all de novo entrants in the Canadian manufacturing sector during 1984—98, reveals that entrants with greater resource and capability endowments are more likely to locate in areas with an agglomeration of similar firms, but this effect reverses at high endowment levels. Additionally, larger entrants are less likely to locate in areas characterized by intense local competition and potential entry deterrence, while smaller and well-endowed entrants tend to locate in areas where entry barriers are lower and asset turnover higher. These findings suggest that entrants choose locations strategically within their founding regions.They also indicate that the strategic imperatives of de novo entrants differ significantly from those of geographically diversifying firms, and thus suggest amendments to theories of location choice when modeling the decisions of new ventures.},
language = {en},
number = {2},
urldate = {2017-10-31},
journal = {Strategic Organization},
author = {Pe'er, Aviad and Vertinsky, Ilan and King, Andrew},
month = may,
year = {2008},
pages = {119--149}
Path-Dependent Startup Hubs - Comparing Metropolitan Performance: High-Tech and ICT Startup Density by Dane Stangler
year = {2005},
pages = {109--127}
Firm Births, Access to Transit, and Agglomeration in Portland, Oregon, and Dallas by Daniel G. Chatman
