Difference between revisions of "Is the Market for Ideas a Market for Lemons?"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "{{AcademicPaper |Has title=Is the Market for Ideas a Market for Lemons? |Has author=Ed Egan, |Has paper status=Idea }} {{AcademicPaper |Has title=Adverse Selection in the Mar...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{AcademicPaper | {{AcademicPaper | ||
|Has title=Is the Market for Ideas a Market for Lemons? | |Has title=Is the Market for Ideas a Market for Lemons? | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|Has author=Ed Egan | |Has author=Ed Egan | ||
|Has paper status=Idea | |Has paper status=Idea | ||
Revision as of 21:25, 22 March 2017
| Academic Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Is the Market for Ideas a Market for Lemons? |
| Author | Ed Egan |
| Status | Idea |
| © edegan.com, 2016 | |
Summary
Rational ignorance at the patent office can only be efficient if there is no market for ideas. If patents are sold then, as their is an information asymmetry between the inventor (or current user) and a purchaser, we expect a market for lemons.
Data:
- Patent data with Assignment Data: Redesigning Patent Database
- Patent litigation data: Lex Machina
