Difference between revisions of "Incubators in Five Ecosystems"

From edegan.com
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 34: Line 34:
 
*[[Cincinnati Ecosystem]]
 
*[[Cincinnati Ecosystem]]
 
*Denver
 
*Denver
*Houston (lots of information - see https://www.bakerinstitute.org/media/files/files/4d81e0d2/McNair-pub-HoustonStartups-053117.pdf)
+
*Houston (lots of information - see [https://www.bakerinstitute.org/media/files/files/4d81e0d2/McNair-pub-HoustonStartups-053117.pdf A pipeline for Houston startups (pdf)])
 
*St. Louis
 
*St. Louis

Revision as of 19:37, 19 March 2019


Project
Incubators in Five Ecosystems
Project logo 02.png
Project Information
Has title Incubators in Five Ecosystems
Has start date
Has deadline date
Has project status Active
Does subsume Ecosystem: Austin or Houston, Ecosystem: Burlington VT, Ecosystem: Denver CO, Ecosystem: Unconventional Ecosystem, Ecosystem: Washington DC
Subsumed by: Ecosystem Organization Classifier
Copyright © 2019 edegan.com. All Rights Reserved.


Choosing Ecosystems

VC Rankings

We want cities that have some venture capital investment. Ranking US Cities by Venture Capital provides data on those cities.

TIF data

It might also be useful to do cities where we have other useful data. One thing we might use is cities listed in the TIF Project, especially:

  • 1.3.1 Chicago,IL
  • 1.3.2 Columbus, OH
  • 1.3.3 Washington, DC
  • 1.3.4 Houston, TX
  • 1.3.5 Dallas, TX
  • 1.3.6 Vermont -- and so Burlington, VT
  • 1.3.7 Dublin, OH
  • 1.3.8 Allegheny County, PA -- and so Pittsburg, PA

Other possibilities include:

  • St. Louis (TIF data without GIS info)
  • Atlanta (appears to have TIF data with GIS info)
  • Cincinnati (has TIFs but no data)

Emerging Ecosystems

Note that we have material on some ecosystems in E:\mcnair\projects\ecosystem. These include some Emerging Ecosystems, some of which had blog articles written about them that Ed may be able to recover: