Difference between revisions of "Galasso Schankerman (2008) - Patent Thickets And The Market For Innovation"

From edegan.com
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Ed
m (1 revision)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{Article
 +
|Has page=Galasso Schankerman (2008) - Patent Thickets And The Market For Innovation
 +
|Has bibtex key=
 +
|Has article title=Patent Thickets And The Market For Innovation
 +
|Has author=Galasso Schankerman
 +
|Has year=2008
 +
|In journal=
 +
|In volume=
 +
|In number=
 +
|Has pages=
 +
|Has publisher=
 +
}}
  
 
*This page is referenced in the [[Patent Thicket Literature Review]]
 
*This page is referenced in the [[Patent Thicket Literature Review]]

Latest revision as of 19:14, 29 September 2020

Article
Has bibtex key
Has article title Patent Thickets And The Market For Innovation
Has author Galasso Schankerman
Has year 2008
In journal
In volume
In number
Has pages
Has publisher
© edegan.com, 2016


Reference

  • Galasso, A. and Schankerman, M. (2008), "Patent Thickets and the Market for Innovation: Evidence from Settlement of Patent Disputes", Working Paper
@article{galasso2008patent,
  title={Patent Thickets and the Market for Innovation: Evidence from Settlement of Patent Disputes},
  author={Galasso, A. and Schankerman, M.},
  year={2008},
  abstract={We study how fragmentation of patent rights (‘patent thickets’) and the formation of the Court of Appeal for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affected the duration of patent disputes, and thus the speed of technology diffusion through licensing. We develop a model of patent litigation which predicts faster settlement agreements when patent rights are fragmented and when there is less uncertainty about court outcomes, as was associated with the ‘pro-patent shift’ of CAFC. The model also predicts that the impact of fragmentation on settlement duration should be smaller under CAFC. We confirm these predictions empirically using a dataset that covers nearly all patent suits in U.S. federal district courts during the period 1975-2000. Finally, we analyze how fragmentation affects total settlement delay, taking into account both reduction in duration per dispute and the increase in the number of required patent negotiations associated with patent thickets.},
  discipline={Econ},
  research_type={Empirical},
  industry={},
  thicket_stance={},
  thicket_stance_extract={},
  thicket_def={},
  thicket_def_extract={},  
  tags={},
  filename={Galasso Schankerman (2008) - Patent Thickets And The Market For Innovation.pdf}
}

File(s)

Abstract

We study how fragmentation of patent rights (‘patent thickets’) and the formation of the Court of Appeal for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affected the duration of patent disputes, and thus the speed of technology diffusion through licensing. We develop a model of patent litigation which predicts faster settlement agreements when patent rights are fragmented and when there is less uncertainty about court outcomes, as was associated with the ‘pro-patent shift’ of CAFC. The model also predicts that the impact of fragmentation on settlement duration should be smaller under CAFC. We confirm these predictions empirically using a dataset that covers nearly all patent suits in U.S. federal district courts during the period 1975-2000. Finally, we analyze how fragmentation affects total settlement delay, taking into account both reduction in duration per dispute and the increase in the number of required patent negotiations associated with patent thickets.