Difference between revisions of "Becker (1983) - A Theory Of Competition Among Pressure Groups For Political Influence"

From edegan.com
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Bo
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{Article
 +
|Has page=Becker (1983) - A Theory Of Competition Among Pressure Groups For Political Influence
 +
|Has bibtex key=
 +
|Has article title=A Theory Of Competition Among Pressure Groups For Political Influence
 +
|Has author=Becker
 +
|Has year=1983
 +
|In journal=
 +
|In volume=
 +
|In number=
 +
|Has pages=
 +
|Has publisher=
 +
}}
 
==Reference(s)==
 
==Reference(s)==
 
Becker, G. (1983), A Theory of Competition Among Pressure Groups for Political Influence, Quarterly Journal of Economics 98(3), 371-400. [http://www.edegan.com/pdfs/Becker%20(1983)%20-%20A%20Theory%20of%20Competition%20Among%20Pressure%20Groups%20for%20Political%20Influence.pdf pdf]
 
Becker, G. (1983), A Theory of Competition Among Pressure Groups for Political Influence, Quarterly Journal of Economics 98(3), 371-400. [http://www.edegan.com/pdfs/Becker%20(1983)%20-%20A%20Theory%20of%20Competition%20Among%20Pressure%20Groups%20for%20Political%20Influence.pdf pdf]

Latest revision as of 19:14, 29 September 2020

Article
Has bibtex key
Has article title A Theory Of Competition Among Pressure Groups For Political Influence
Has author Becker
Has year 1983
In journal
In volume
In number
Has pages
Has publisher
© edegan.com, 2016

Reference(s)

Becker, G. (1983), A Theory of Competition Among Pressure Groups for Political Influence, Quarterly Journal of Economics 98(3), 371-400. pdf

Abstract

This paper presents a theory of competition among pressure groups for political influence. Political equilibrium depends on the efficiency of each group in producing pressure, the effect of additional pressure on their influence, the number of persons in different groups, and the deadweight cost of taxes and subsidies. An increase in deadweight costs discourages pressure by subsidized groups and encourages pressure by taxpayers. This analysis unifies the view that governments correct market failures with the view that they favor the politically powerful: both are produced by the competition for political favors.

Model

Two groups compete: one to obtain subsidies (group S) and the other to avoid being taxed (group T).


General conclusion: (i) relatively efficient policies are more likely to beobserved than relatively inefficient ones, and

(ii) competition among pressure groups favors efficient methods for redistribution