Patent Thicket Literature Review - Revision history

Ed: Ed moved page Patent Thicket Literature Review to Untangling the Economics of Patent Thickets

2017-11-29T01:56:43Z

Ed moved page Patent Thicket Literature Review to Untangling the Economics of Patent Thickets

Show changes

imported>Ed: /* Workflow */

2013-04-03T01:57:43Z

Workflow

imported>Ed: /* Convergence Process */

2013-03-26T23:16:40Z

Convergence Process

imported>Ed: /* Process 6a */

2013-03-22T23:48:00Z

Process 6a

imported>Ed: /* Process 6a */

2013-03-22T23:20:06Z

Process 6a

imported>Ed: /* Process 5a */

2013-03-22T00:28:52Z

Process 5a

imported>Ed: /* Workflow */

2013-03-22T00:28:26Z

Workflow

imported>Ed: /* Process of the review */

2013-03-22T00:18:10Z

Process of the review

imported>Ed: /* Process of the review */

2013-03-22T00:17:57Z

Process of the review

imported>Ed: /* Process of the review */

2013-03-22T00:17:00Z

Process of the review

@@ Line 165: / Line 165: @@
 #[[PTLR Up Group Processed BibTeX]]
 #[[PTLR Down Group Processed BibTeX]]
-#[[PTLR Discard Filenames]]
+#[[PTLR Discard Processed BibTeX]]
 For the core and down group papers we '''won't''' be filling out the following tags (at least yet for the core group papers, and probably ever for the down group papers):

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:16, 26 March 2013
Line 62:		Line 62:

	The references for these papers were then matched against one another to produce counts of the most cited papers within the core group. This process led to 313 papers that were cited by more than one paper in the core group. Of these 239 were not in the original sample of 251. Each of these 239 papers was briefly checked to see whether it should be added to the core group and 8 papers were added.		The references for these papers were then matched against one another to produce counts of the most cited papers within the core group. This process led to 313 papers that were cited by more than one paper in the core group. Of these 239 were not in the original sample of 251. Each of these 239 papers was briefly checked to see whether it should be added to the core group and 8 papers were added.
		+
		+	The source 'Core' papers used in the covergence process are listed on the [[PTLR Convergence Inputs]] page, and the results of the convergence process are listed on the [[PTLR Convergence Results]] page.

	==BibTeX Entry Tagging==		==BibTeX Entry Tagging==

@@ Line 251: / Line 251: @@
 #[[Hall (2012) - A Study Of Patent Thickets]]  - this paper has already been checked in detail
 #[[Hargreaves (2011) - Digital Opportunity]]
 #[[UKIPO (2011) - Patent Thickets An Overview]]
 In addition, we should check the following non-core papers (found in the dropbox folder):
 *FTC (2011) - The Evolving IP Marketplace.pdf

@@ Line 240: / Line 240: @@
 ===Process 6a===
-For each paper in the [[PTLR Core Papers]] list, we need to go through and check their 'core' papers are a subset of ours. Thus, if some paper in the list makes a statement like:
+For each paper in the [[PTLR Core Papers]] list (except Hall (2012), which has already been checked), we need to go through and check their 'core' papers are a subset of ours. Thus, if some paper in the list makes a statement like:
 :''"X (yyyy) provides empirical evidence of the existance of patent thickets"''
 or
 :''"X (yyyy) provides the seminal model of a patent thicket"''
-then we need to check that X (yyyy) is included in our list of core papers. Essentially, we need to check the lit review sections of our core papers. [[Hall (2012) - A Study Of Patent Thickets]] has already been checked.
+then we need to check that X (yyyy) is included in our list of core papers. Essentially, we need to check the lit review sections of our core papers.

@@ Line 209: / Line 209: @@
 **Balance with Anti-trust
 **License to Innovate/Research Exemptions
-**Complusory Licensing
+**Compulsory Licensing
 **Industry Specific Policy
 **Prevent Hold-up/Royalty Stacking

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:28, 22 March 2013
Line 181:		Line 181:

	tag contents for the down group. Possible tags other than empirical, theory, and discussion, might be econometric methods, stylized facts, etc. I.e., we want to capture what the research is providing in meta terms with this tag.		tag contents for the down group. Possible tags other than empirical, theory, and discussion, might be econometric methods, stylized facts, etc. I.e., we want to capture what the research is providing in meta terms with this tag.
		+
		+	===Process 5a===
		+
		+	We need to fill out the
		+	tags={},
		+
		+	tag for the Up group. Free form tags are useful, but having most of the tags standardized will facilitate the analysis of the Up group. The following tags are suggested:
		+	*Firm Strategy
		+	**Collaboration
		+	**Value from Position/Portfolio
		+	**Defensive/Offensive Patenting
		+	**Oligopoly
		+	**Mutual Non-Aggression/Mexican Standoff/Mutually Assured Destruction
		+	**Willful infringement
		+	**Blocking Patents
		+	**Secrecy
		+	**Pre-emptive Patenting
		+	**Evergreening
		+	**Litigation Insurance
		+	*Industry Commentary
		+	*IPR Reform
		+	**Renewal
		+	**Duration Limits
		+	**Stricter Patenting Requirements
		+	**Creation of New Classification
		+	**Review of Patent Validity
		+	**Balance with Anti-trust
		+	**License to Innovate/Research Exemptions
		+	**Complusory Licensing
		+	**Industry Specific Policy
		+	**Prevent Hold-up/Royalty Stacking
		+	**International Harmonization
		+	**Change to Nature of IPR
		+	*Private Mechanisms
		+	**Pools
		+	**Clearinghouses
		+	**Collectives
		+	**Licensing
		+	**Cross-Licensing
		+	**Regime Selection
		+	**Standards
		+	**SSOs
		+	**FRAND
		+	**Litigation
		+	**Patent Intermediaries
		+	**NPEs (inc. Trolls)
		+	**Joint Ventures
		+	**Shared Platforms
		+	**Open Source
		+	*Effects on Academic Research
		+	*Complements
		+	*Substitutes
		+	*Sequential Innovation
		+	*Cummulative Innovation
		+
		+	If a second level tag is included then the corresponding first level tag should be included too. That is if the 'Pools' tag is used then the 'Private Mechanism' tag should be used too.
		+
		+	===Process 6a===
		+
		+	For each paper in the [[PTLR Core Papers]] list, we need to go through and check their 'core' papers are a subset of ours. Thus, if some paper in the list makes a statement like:
		+	:''"X (yyyy) provides empirical evidence of the existance of patent thickets"''
		+	or
		+	:''"X (yyyy) provides the seminal model of a patent thicket"''
		+	then we need to check that X (yyyy) is included in our list of core papers. Essentially, we need to check the lit review sections of our core papers. [[Hall (2012) - A Study Of Patent Thickets]] has already been checked.

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 #*The literature review of each paper in the core was checked to ensure that all referenced core papers are included in the core.
-We are currently conducting steps 5a, 6, and 6a of this process. For 5a and 6a, see the [[#Workflow|workflow] section below.
+We are currently conducting steps 5a, 6, and 6a of this process. For 5a and 6a, see the [[#Workflow|workflow]] section below.
 ==Original Sample==

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 #Additional core papers, indentified in the Convergence Process were added to the sample
 #All papers were manually classified into groups and [[#BibTeX Entry Tagging | bibtex entry tagging]] was performed
 #Complete reviews of all of the [[PTLR Core Papers | Core papers]] were conducted.
-We are currently conducting step 6 of this process.
+We are currently conducting steps 5a, 6, and 6a of this process.
 ==Original Sample==