Incubator Seed Data Coverage - Revision history

Ed at 17:41, 21 September 2020

2020-09-21T17:41:43Z

Ed at 17:34, 21 September 2020

2020-09-21T17:34:18Z

Ed at 16:29, 20 September 2020

2020-09-20T16:29:14Z

Ed at 16:29, 20 September 2020

2020-09-20T16:29:13Z

Ed: /* Results */

2019-10-05T16:34:35Z

Results

Ed: /* Results */

2019-10-05T16:33:35Z

Results

Ed: /* Results */

2019-10-05T16:32:53Z

Results

Ed: /* Results */

2019-10-05T02:44:09Z

Results

Ed: /* Results */

2019-10-05T02:43:56Z

Results

Ed: /* Process */

2019-10-05T02:36:47Z

Process

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{Project
-|Has project output=
+|Has project output=Data
 |Has sponsor=Kauffman Incubator Project
 |Has sponsor=Kauffman Incubator Project

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{Project
 |Has sponsor=Kauffman Incubator Project
 |Has sponsor=Kauffman Incubator Project

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{Project
 |Has sponsor=Kauffman Incubator Project
 |Has title=Incubator Seed Data Coverage

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{Project
 |Has title=Incubator Seed Data Coverage
 |Has owner=Ed Egan,

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:34, 5 October 2019
Line 268:		Line 268:
	'''Overall, 73% of the incubators in the hand-collected data are present in the seed data.'''		'''Overall, 73% of the incubators in the hand-collected data are present in the seed data.'''

−	The three of the four absent incubators have a university affiliation. AU Entrepreneurship Incubator is based at American University in DC, IncubatorCTX is based at Concordia University in Northwest Austin, and Discovery Launchpad at UMN is at the University of Minnesota. This suggests that we would need another source of data to capture academic incubators. The fourth missing incubator is the branch office of a chain. This chain does not describe itself as an incubator but appears to meet the criteria for one. We could attempt to put together data on incubator chains and their offices separately. The data also suggests that the different sources do capture different incubators. There is little apparent correlation between the sources, and the Google Crawler is the only one to capture more than half of the incubators.	+	The three of the four absent incubators have a university affiliation. AU Entrepreneurship Incubator is based at American University in DC, IncubatorCTX is based at Concordia University in Northwest Austin, and Discovery Launchpad at UMN is at the University of Minnesota. This suggests that we would need another source of data to capture academic incubators. The fourth missing incubator is the branch office of a chain (Galvanize). This chain does not describe itself as an incubator but appears to meet the criteria for one. We could attempt to put together data on incubator chains and their offices separately. The data also suggests that the different sources do capture different incubators. There is little apparent correlation between the sources, and the Google Crawler is the only one to capture more than half of the incubators.

@@ Line 266: / Line 266: @@
 *For Galvanize, the Seattle location is in US Incubators and the San Francisco and New York City locations are both in AngelList.
-'''Overall, 73% of the incubators in the hand-collected data are present in the seed data. The project therefore met its objective!'''
+'''Overall, 73% of the incubators in the hand-collected data are present in the seed data.'''
 The three of the four absent incubators have a university affiliation. AU Entrepreneurship Incubator is based at American University in DC, IncubatorCTX is based at Concordia University in Northwest Austin, and Discovery Launchpad at UMN is at the University of Minnesota. This suggests that we would need another source of data to capture academic incubators. The fourth missing incubator is the branch office of a chain. This chain does not describe itself as an incubator but appears to meet the criteria for one. We could attempt to put together data on incubator chains and their offices separately. The data also suggests that the different sources do capture different incubators. There is little apparent correlation between the sources, and the Google Crawler is the only one to capture more than half of the incubators.

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:32, 5 October 2019
Line 268:		Line 268:
	'''Overall, 73% of the incubators in the hand-collected data are present in the seed data. The project therefore met its objective!'''		'''Overall, 73% of the incubators in the hand-collected data are present in the seed data. The project therefore met its objective!'''

−	The three absent incubators ~~all~~ have a university affiliation. AU Entrepreneurship Incubator is based at American University in DC, IncubatorCTX is based at Concordia University in Northwest Austin, and Discovery Launchpad at UMN is at the University of Minnesota. This suggests that we would need another source of data to capture academic incubators. The data also suggests that the different sources do capture different incubators. There is little apparent correlation between the sources, and the Google Crawler is the only one to capture more than half of the incubators.	+	The three of the four absent incubators have a university affiliation. AU Entrepreneurship Incubator is based at American University in DC, IncubatorCTX is based at Concordia University in Northwest Austin, and Discovery Launchpad at UMN is at the University of Minnesota. This suggests that we would need another source of data to capture academic incubators. The fourth missing incubator is the branch office of a chain. This chain does not describe itself as an incubator but appears to meet the criteria for one. We could attempt to put together data on incubator chains and their offices separately. The data also suggests that the different sources do capture different incubators. There is little apparent correlation between the sources, and the Google Crawler is the only one to capture more than half of the incubators.

@@ Line 104: / Line 104: @@
 ==Results==
-In the table below, 1 indicates the incubator was present in the source, and 0 indicates it was absent.
+In the table below, 1 indicates the incubator was present in the source, and 0 indicates it was absent. The last column, labelled '''any''' records if the incubator was in our complete seed data, comprised of the '''incubator''' table and the [[Google Crawler]] results.
 {| class="wikitable"
@@ Line 265: / Line 265: @@
 *For Bunker Labs, the Austin location is missing but the Seattle location is in US Incubators, the Chicago location is in AngelList, and the Google crawler found an Arlington, VA location too.
 *For Galvanize, the Seattle location is in US Incubators and the San Francisco and New York City locations are both in AngelList.

@@ Line 100: / Line 100: @@
 And out of the 15 incubator names, 11 were in our '''incubators''' table (irrespective of location), and of these y had name variation(s).
-Fortunately the count is small, so we can conduct a manual review. For the Google crawler, we only count a hit if the website of the incubator itself is included in the results, rather than a news article or other information that references the incubator. In the table below, 1 indicates the incubator was present in the source, and 0 indicates it was absent.
+Fortunately the count is small, so we can conduct a manual review. For the Google crawler, we only count a hit if the website of the incubator itself is included in the results, rather than a news article or other information that references the incubator.
 {| class="wikitable"