747
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Targeting Rogue and Opaque Letters (TROL) Act (view source)
Revision as of 15:08, 2 September 2016
, 15:08, 2 September 2016no edit summary
Return to [[Innovation Policy#Patent Reform|Patent Reform]]
'''H.R.2045: Targeting Rogue and Opaque Letters (TROL) Act (2015)'''
===Dissenting===
*A reply to the letter written by 51 scholars in support of restricting patent litigation states that studies claiming large problems with patent litigation misconstrue the issues. Adam Mossoff is one of the co-authors for the reply letter. [http://cpip.gmu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Economists-Law-Profs-Letter-re-Patent-Reform.pdf][http://patentlyo.com/patent/2015/03/professor-patent-reform.html]
*The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) has stated that TROL act does not do enough in regard to patent reform for reasons listed below:
One of the biggest motivations behind the TROL Act is the 2014 Federal Trade Commission investigation into MPHJ Technology Investments, LLC (MPHJ). The investigation revealed that MPHJ had sent demand letters to "16,465 small businesses located in all fifty states and the District of Columbia."[https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/cases/150317mphjtechcmpt.pdf]
[[Category: Public]]
[[Public Classification::Legislation| ]]
