Changes

{{Project|Has project output=|Has sponsor=McNair ProjectsCenter

To avoid data-racing, in each iteration m, we stored epsim12 into epsim_cell, and compute f using another for loop. Using parfor on a 12-cores machine gives a four time speed up for computing msmf_corr_coeff.m (apology for not having a profiling screenshot here). Note that the actual speedup depends how many cores you are using. For the same R, monte_M, and mktsize, it now takes ~ 35 seconds to finish one call to msmf_corr_coeff. [[FILE:msmf_corr_coeff_speedup.png]] ==Around line 120 of msmf_corr_coeff solving LP problems==For a large R, e.g. R = 200, solving 200 linear programming problems in parallel should be beneficial, especially when the each LP itself is easy to solve (takes less than 0.1 seconds each). Initially we managed to use gurobi inside a parfor: % Gurobi inisde parfor. For large R (>100). By Wei. model.rhs = [full(constrB); full(constrM)]; model.A = [sparse(B);sparse(-B)]; model.ub = ones(L,1); model.lb = zeros(L,1); model.sense = '<'; for r = 1 : R % solve_LP is a function wrapper. It calls gurobi to solve a single LP. asgr(:,r) = solve_LP(r,f,model); end  % The function wrapper to use Gurobi function X = solve_LP(r,f,model) model.obj = f(:,r); parameters.outputflag = 0; result = gurobi(model, parameters); X = result.x; end However using Gurobi actually did not help with the code performance. This is possibly due to the cost to create models for each Gurobi object. Gurobi is indeed the best commercial solver in the market, but it should be used for solving large LPs (hundreds of thousands of constraints), where as our Lp has only a few thousand constraints. We reversed back to using Matlab's native linprog: % Solve LPs in parallel with Matlab's native linprog parfor r = 1 : R options = optimset('Display', 'off'); [asgr(:, r), ~, eflag(r)] = linprog(f(:, r), [B;-B], [constrB; constrM], [], [], zeros(L, 1), ones(L,1),options); end =Possible Further Improvements=At this point I believe I have done everything I could for code performance. However if you look at the profiler, you will find that the function moments also takes a good percentage of time. I tried to parallelise moments with parfor, but it did not give any improvements.