Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
PTLR Discard Processed BibTeX (view source)
Revision as of 18:45, 8 April 2013
, 18:45, 8 April 2013→Discard From Up Group By Ed (Apr 8th)
}
===Discard From Uncertain GroupFile By Kai===
@article{arora2001markets,
tags={} ,
filename={Wasserman Faust (1994) - Social Network Analysis Methods And Applications.pdf}
}
===Discard From Up Group By Ed (Apr 8th)===
@article{carrier2012roadmap,
title={A Roadmap to the Smartphone Patent Wars and FRAND Licensing},
author={Carrier, M.},
journal={CPI Antitrust Chronicle},
volume={2},
year={2012},
abstract={The smartphone industry today is characterized by a thicket of patents and wars based on those patents. Every day brings a new lawsuit or development between Apple, HTC, Microsoft, Motorola Mobility (“MMI”), Nokia, and Samsung. The lawsuits span numerous courts and several continents. And they often pit Apple or Microsoft on one side and manufacturers of Google’s Android operating system—HTC, MMI, and Samsung—on the other.},
discipline={Law},
research_type={Discussion},
industry={ICT},
thicket_stance={Neutral},
thicket_stance_extract={The smartphone industry today is characterized by a thicket of patents and wars based on those patents.},
thicket_def={},
thicket_def_extract={},
tags={Private Mechanisms, Industry Commentary, Standards, SSOs, FRAND, SEP, Licensing},
filename={Carrier (2012) - A Roadmap To The Smartphone Patent Wars And Frand Licensing.pdf}
}
@article{gilbert2004antitrust,
title={Antitrust for Patent Pools: A Century of Policy Evolution},
author={Gilbert, R.J.},
journal={Stanford Technology Law Review},
volume={2004},
year={2004},
abstract={},
discipline={Law},
research_type={Discussion, Equations},
industry={General},
thicket_stance={},
thicket_stance_extract={},
thicket_def={Single Firm, Unspecified Blocking Mechanism, Barrier To Entry},
thicket_def_extract={The court ruled that the contracts that allocated exclusive territories among National Lead and other companies violated the antitrust laws. The court also concluded that the contract between DuPont and National Lead was anticompetitive. The court ruled that the agreement to license present and future patents and to share know-how contributed to a patent thicket that created a barrier to new entry and allowed DuPont and National Lead to control the domestic industry for titanium dioxide products.},
tags={Private Mechanisms, Balance with Anti-trust, Pools},
filename={Gilbert (2004) - Antitrust For Patent Pools A Century Of Policy Evolution.pdf}
}
