Changes

*Abril, P.S. Plant, R. 2007. The patent holder’s dilemma: buy, sell, or troll? Communications of the ACM, vol. 50 50 (1), pp. 36-44.[http://www.edegan.com/pdfs/Abril%20Plant%20(2007)%20-%20The%20patent%20holders%20dilemma.pdf pdf]*Allison, J.R., Lemley, M.A., Walker, J. 2010. Patent quality and risk aversion among repeat patent litigants.[http://www.edegan.com/pdfs/Allison%20Lemley%20Walker%20(2010)%20-%20Patent%20Quality%20and%20Risk%20Aversion%20Among%20Repeat%20Patent%20Litigants.pdf pdf]*Beron, B.L. Kinsella, J.E. 2011. David vs. goliath patent cases: A search for the most practical mechanism of third party litigation financing for small plaintiffs. N. Ky. L. Rev., vol. 3838, pp. 605-687.*Casagrande, T.L. 2006. The reach of ebay inc. v. mercexchange, llc: Not just for trolls and patents. Hous. Law., vol. 4444, pp. 10-11.[http://www.edegan.com/pdfs/Casagrande%20(2006)%20-%20The%20Reach%20of%20eBay%20Inc%20v%20MercExchange%20LLC.pdf pdf]*Chan, J. Fawcett, M. 2005. Footsteps of the patent troll. Intell. Prop. L. Bull., vol. 1010, p. 11. [http://www.edegan.com/pdfs/Chan%20Fawcett%20(2005)%20-%20Footsteps%20of%20the%20Patent%20Troll.pdf pdf]*Chien, C.V. 2008. Of trolls, davids, goliaths, and kings: Narratives and evidence in the litigation of high-tech patents. NCL Rev., vol. 8787, p. 1571.[http://www.edegan.com/pdfs/Chien%20(2008)%20-%20Of%20Trolls%20Davids%20Goliaths%20and%20Kings.pdf pdf]*Chien, C.V. 2010. From arms race to marketplace: The new complex patent ecosystem. Hastings Law Journal, vol. 6262. [http://www.edegan.com/pdfs/Chien%20(2010)%20-%20From%20Arms%20Race%20to%20Marketplace.pdf pdf]*Cooper FeldmanCooper Feldman, R. Ewing, T. 2011. The giants among us.[http://www.edegan.com/pdfs/CooperFeldman%20Ewing%20(2011)%20-%20The%20Giants%20Among%20Us.pdf pdf]*Eddings, R. 2005. Trolls and titans take fight to top court. Loy. Consumer L. Rev., vol. 1818, p. 503.[http://www.edegan.com/pdfs/Eddings%20(2005)%20-%20Trolls%20and%20Titans%20Take%20Fight%20to%20Top%20Court.pdf pdf]*Farrand, J.R., Shapiro, V.C., Abbott, P.A., Stothers, C.M., Weisberg, S.D., Killworth, R.A. 2011. Judicial reform of patent litigation in the usa. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, vol. 6 6 (6), pp. 381-395.[http://www.edegan.com/pdfs/Farrand%20(2011)%20-%20Judicial%20reform%20of%20patent%20litigation%20in%20the%20USA.pdf pdf]*Ferrill, E.D. 2004. Patent investment trusts: Let’s build a pit to catch the patent trolls. NCJL & Tech., vol. 66, p. 367.[http://www.edegan.com/pdfs/Ferrill%20(2004)%20-%20Patent%20Investment%20Trusts.pdf pdf]*Fischer, T. Henkel, J. 2009. Patent trolls on markets for technology-an empirical analysis of trolls’ patent acquisitions.[http://www.edegan.com/pdfs/Fischer%20Henkel%20(2009)%20-%20Patent%20Trolls%20on%20Markets%20for%20Technology.pdf pdf]*Geradin, D., Layne-Farrar, A., Padilla, A.J. 2012. Elves or trolls? the role of non-practicing patent owners in the innovation economy. Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 21 21 (1), pp. 73-94.[http://www.edegan.com/pdfs/Geradin%20LayneFarrar%20Padilla%20(2012)%20-%20Elves%20or%20Trolls.pdf pdf]*Golden, J.M. 2006. Patent trolls and patent remedies. Tex. L. Rev., vol. 8585, p. 2111.[http://www.edegan.com/pdfs/Golden%20(2006)%20-%20Patent%20Trolls%20and%20Patent%20Remedies.pdf pdf]*Gregory, J.K. 2006. Troll next door, the. J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L., vol. 66, p. ii. [http://www.edegan.com/pdfs/Gregory%20(2006)%20-%20The%20Troll%20Next%20Door.pdf pdf]*Hagiu, A. Yoffie, D. 2011. Intermediaries for the ip market.[http://www.edegan.com/pdfs/Hagiu%20Yoffie%20(2011)%20-%20Intermediaries%20for%20the%20IP%20market.pdf pdf]*Harkins, C.A. 2007. Fending off paper patents and patent trolls: A novel cold fusion defense because changing times demand it. Alb. LJ Sci. & Tech., vol. 1717, p. 407.[http://www.edegan.com/pdfs/Harkins%20(2007)%20-%20Fending%20off%20Paper%20Patents%20and%20Patent%20Trolls.pdf pdf]*Helm, J.S. 2006. Why pharmaceutical firms support patent trolls: The disparate impact of ebay v. mercexchange on innovation. Mich. Telecomm. & Tech. L. Rev., vol. 1313, p. 331.[http://www.edegan.com/pdfs/Helm%20(2006)%20-%20Why%20Pharmaceutical%20Firms%20Support%20Patent%20Trolls.pdf pdf]*Helm, K.A. Lee, G.W. 2008. Call it a comeback: A sweeping change in the law on declaratory judgment actions against patent owners. NYU Ann. Surv. Am. L., vol. 6464, p. 231.[http://www.edegan.com/pdfs/Helm%20Lee%20(2008)%20-%20Call%20It%20a%20Comeback.pdf pdf]*Hricik, D. 2010. Legal ethics and non-practicing entities: Being on the receiving end matters too. Santa Clara Computer & High Tech. LJ, vol. 2727, pp. 793-793.*Jones, M. 2006. Permanent injunction, a remedy by any other name is patently not the same: How ebay v. mercexchange affects the patent right of non-practicing entities. Geo. Mason L. Rev., vol. 1414, p. 1035.[http://www.edegan.com/pdfs/Jones%20(2006)%20-%20Permanent%20Injunction%20A%20Remedy%20by%20Any%20Other%20Name%20is%20Patently%20Not%20the%20Same.pdf pdf]*Layne-Farrar, A. 2012. The brothers grimm book of business models: A survey of literature and developments in patent acquisition and litigation.[http://www.edegan.com/pdfs/LayneFarrar%20(2012)%20-%20The%20Brothers%20Grimm%20Book%20of%20Business%20Models.pdf pdf]*Lemley, M. 2011. Contracting around liability rules.[http://www.edegan.com/pdfs/Lemley%20(2007)%20-%20Are%20universities%20patent%20trolls.pdf pdf]*Lemley, M.A. 2007. Are universities patent trolls. Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. LJ, vol. 1818, p. 611.[http://www.edegan.com/pdfs/Lemley%20(2011)%20-%20Contracting%20Around%20Liability%20Rules.pdf pdf]*Liang, M. 2010. The aftermath of ts tech: The end of forum shopping in patent litigation and implications for non-practicing entities. Tex. Intell. Prop. LJ, vol. 1919, pp. 29-419.[http://www.edegan.com/pdfs/Liang%20(2010)%20-%20The%20Aftermath%20of%20TS%20Tech.pdf pdf]*Love, B. 2011. An empirical study of patent litigation timing: Could a patent term reduction decimate trolls without harming innovators? [http://www.edegan.com/pdfs/Love%20(2011)%20-%20An%20Empirical%20Study%20of%20Patent%20Litigation%20Timing.pdf pdf]*Lu, J. 2011a. The economics and controversies of nonpracticing entities (npes): How npes and defensive patent aggregators will change license market.*Lu, J. 2011b. Have non-practicing entities (npe’s) been overcompensated? *Magliocca, G.N. 2006. Blackberries and barnyards: Patent trolls and the perils of innovation. Notre Dame L. Rev., vol. 8282, p. 1809.[http://www.edegan.com/pdfs/Magliocca%20(2006)%20-%20Blackberries%20and%20barnyards.pdf pdf]*Maughan, E. 2012. Protecting the rights of inventors: How natural rights theory should influence the injunction analysis in patent infringement cases. Geo. JL & Pub. Pol’y, vol. 1010, pp. 215-321.*McDonough IIIMcDonough III, J.F. 2006. Myth of the patent troll: An alternative view of the function of patent dealers in an idea economy, the. Emory LJ, vol. 5656, p. 189.[http://www.edegan.com/pdfs/McDonough%20(2006)%20-%20Myth%20of%20the%20Patent%20Troll.pdf pdf]*Merges, R.P. 2009. The trouble with trolls: Innovation, rent-seeking, and patent law reform. Berkeley Tech. LJ, vol. 2424, pp. 1583-1647.[http://www.edegan.com/pdfs/Merges%20(2009)%20-%20The%20Trouble%20with%20Trolls.pdf pdf]*Mersino, P.M. 2007. Patents, trolls, and personal property: Will ebay auction away a patent holder’s right to exclude. Ave Maria L. Rev., vol. 66, p. 307.[http://www.edegan.com/pdfs/Mersino%20(2007)%20-%20Patents%20Trolls%20and%20Personal%20Property.pdf pdf]*Miller, S. 2011. Patent ‘trolls’: Rent-seeking parasites or innovation-facilitating middlemen? [http://www.edegan.com/pdfs/Miller%20(2011)%20-%20Patent%20Trolls%20Rent%20Seeking%20Parasites%20or%20Innovation%20Facilitating%20Middlemen.pdf pdf]*Morgan, M. 2008. Stop looking under the bridge for imaginary creatures: A comment examining who really deserves the title patent troll. Fed. Cir. BJ, vol. 1717, p. 165.*Myers, D[http://www. 2006edegan.com/pdfs/Morgan%20(2008)%20-%20Stop%20Looking%20Under%20the%20Bridge%20for%20Imaginary%20Creatures.pdf pdf]*Myers, D. 2006. Reeling in the patent troll: Was ebay v. mercexchange enough. J. Intell. Prop. L., vol. 1414, p. 333.[http://www.edegan.com/pdfs/Myers%20(2006)%20-%20Reeling%20in%20the%20Patent%20Troll.pdf pdf]*Pohlmann, T. Opitz, M. 2010. The patent troll business: An efficient model to enforce ipr? *Reitzig [http://www.edegan.com/pdfs/Pohlmann%20Opitz%20(2010)%20-%20The%20Patent%20Troll%20Business.pdf pdf]*Reitzig, M., Henkel, J., Heath, C. 2006. On sharks, trolls, and other patent animals:‘being infringed’as a normatively induced innovation exploitation strategy. In Available at SSRN, vol. 885914.[http://www.edegan.com/pdfs/Reitzig%20Henkel%20Heath%20(2006)%20-%20On%20Sharks%20Trolls%20and%20Other%20Patent%20Animals.pdf pdf]*Risch, M. 2011. Patent troll myths. Seton Hall Law Review.[http://www.edegan.com/pdfs/Risch%20(2011)%20-%20Patent%20Troll%20Myths.pdf pdf]*Shrestha, S. 2010. Trolls or market-makers? an empirical analysis of non-practicing entities.[http://www.edegan.com/pdfs/Shrestha%20(2010)%20-%20Trolls%20or%20Market%20makers.pdf pdf]*Sichelman, T. 2011. Purging patent law of ‘private law’ remedies.[http://www.edegan.com/pdfs/Sichelman%20(2011)%20-%20Purging%20Patent%20Law%20of%20Private%20Law%20Remedies.pdf pdf]*Tokic, S. 2012. The role of consumers in deterring settlement agreements based on invalid patents: The case of non-practicing entities. Stan. Tech. L. Rev., vol. 2012, pp. 2-3.[http://www.edegan.com/pdfs/Tokic%20(2012)%20-%20The%20Role%20of%20Consumers%20in%20Deterring%20Settlement%20Agreements%20Based%20on%20Invalid%20Patents.pdf pdf]*Wang, A.W. 2010. Rise of the patent intermediaries. Berkeley Tech. LJ, vol. 2525, pp. 159-1955.[http://www.edegan.com/pdfs/Wang%20(2010)%20-%20Rise%20of%20the%20patent%20intermediaries.pdf pdf]