7,612
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Measuring High-Growth High-Technology Entrepreneurship Ecosystems (view source)
Revision as of 19:20, 3 February 2021
, 19:20, 3 February 2021→2nd R&R
*Good point and I address it like this...
He also reminded me that the median review is a reject, and that this a `good' review based on the distribution of reviews. The reviewer does saythat the paper is useful and helpful:
:"The defining of key terms is a useful contribution of this paper, as are the identification of potentially useful metrics of HGHT entrepreneurship. Furthermore, the examples are often helpful in highlighting their various applications."
*Measure 3 (Pipeline)
*Measure 4 (Raise Rate)
*Measure 5 (Cost per raise)*Measure 6 (Repeat VC)*Measure 6 7 (ESO Expertise)
The old Startup Ranking measure has been dropped. Also, there are two definitions that are close to being measures:
*Definition 8 (Expert)
This version also adds Measure 5 (Cost per raise) as a numbered measure. Measures 1 and 2 provide ways to calculate proxies for return quartiles. Measures 3 , 4 and 4 5 are the central measures of the framework. Measures 5 6 and 6 7 are alternative ways to assess the performance of pipeline components (measure 6 7 is possible without VC investment data).
===RP Constraints===
