7,612
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Measuring High-Growth High-Technology Entrepreneurship Ecosystems (view source)
Revision as of 19:30, 7 December 2020
, 19:30, 7 December 2020→RP Constraints
Because the last round was also an R&R, I presumably met all the other constraints.
====Special Issue Questions====
The special issue posed a series of questions (the full list is below) that I might rephrase to statements as follows:
#Startups (venture-backed and pre-venture backed) are the fundamental constructs, so they are what should be measured, and cities (census places geographically define ecosystems)
#Consistent measurement is key!
#The pipeline framework lays out the key relationships as it maps the mechanisms by which ecosystems get established, mature, decline, or get renewed.
#Venture capital measures add quality dimensions. Using the pipeline framework on top of this quality measure gives more finely grained evaluations of the effectiveness of policy instruments
#Venture capital has timing issues but exits are noisiers and longer term (short vs. long term measures)
#What do existing rankings for ecosystems measure?
#Beyond direct pipeline components, we should think about universities, corporations, and other participants.
#The measures should be able to assess the question: To what extent is government policy accelerating or inhibiting the progress of entrepreneurial ecosystems?
====Reviewer 1's Comments====
