Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
===Closed rule, no specialization===
In this game the committee is not specialized and knows nothing, but it can get an outcome closer to it's ideal point by putting a more attractive bill (than the status quo) on the agenda. <math>p_{0}</math> (the status quo) is exogenous.
The legislative equilibrium is then:
\,</math>
Note that if <math>p_0 = -\overline{\omega}\,</math> then the expected utilities and the Pareto optimality condition are the same as in the open rule with no specialization. ====Rui's Comments ====* All deviated by <math>-\bar{\omega}</math>, so c prefers <math>x_{c}-\omega}</math> f prefers <math>-\omega</math>. * "This is exactly Romer and Rosenthal, but with uncertainty."
===Closed rule, specialization===
Anonymous user

Navigation menu