Difference between revisions of "Acemoglu and Pischke (1998)"

From edegan.com
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Bo
(New page: * What is the author's hypothesis? * How does the author test the hypothesis? * How does the author rule out alternative hypotheses? * How might these tests be run if one had quantitati...)
 
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{Article
 +
|Has page=Acemoglu and Pischke (1998)
 +
|Has bibtex key=
 +
|Has article title=
 +
|Has author=Acemoglu and Pischke
 +
|Has year=1998
 +
|In journal=
 +
|In volume=
 +
|In number=
 +
|Has pages=
 +
|Has publisher=
 +
}}
 +
Theory Questions:
 
* What is the author's hypothesis?  
 
* What is the author's hypothesis?  
 
* How does the author test the hypothesis?  
 
* How does the author test the hypothesis?  
Line 4: Line 17:
 
* How might these tests be run if one had quantitative evidence?  
 
* How might these tests be run if one had quantitative evidence?  
 
* What problems might arise in this quantitative analysis?
 
* What problems might arise in this quantitative analysis?
 +
 +
Empirical Questions:
 +
* What's the author's hypothesis?
 +
* How it is tested?
 +
* What do the tests achieve?
 +
* How could the tests be improved?
 +
* What are the tests' strengths and weaknesses?
 +
* Can you think of any alternative empirical tests?

Latest revision as of 19:14, 29 September 2020

Theory Questions:

  • What is the author's hypothesis?
  • How does the author test the hypothesis?
  • How does the author rule out alternative hypotheses?
  • How might these tests be run if one had quantitative evidence?
  • What problems might arise in this quantitative analysis?
Article
Has bibtex key
Has article title
Has author Acemoglu and Pischke
Has year 1998
In journal
In volume
In number
Has pages
Has publisher
© edegan.com, 2016

Empirical Questions:

  • What's the author's hypothesis?
  • How it is tested?
  • What do the tests achieve?
  • How could the tests be improved?
  • What are the tests' strengths and weaknesses?
  • Can you think of any alternative empirical tests?