Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Women in Entrepreneurship Lit Review (view source)

Revision as of 11:59, 25 January 2018

14,137 bytes added ,  11:59, 25 January 2018
no edit summary
year={2006},
publisher={Wiley Online Library}
}
 
==Gender and Management==
===All Sources Available on Google Scholar or Fondren===
 
Statham, Anne. 1987. “The Gender Model Revisited: Differences in the Management Styles of Men and Women.” Sex Roles 16 (7–8):409–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289552.
@article{statham_gender_1987,
title = {The gender model revisited: {Differences} in the management styles of men and women},
volume = {16},
issn = {0360-0025, 1573-2762},
shorttitle = {The gender model revisited},
url = {https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00289552},
doi = {10.1007/BF00289552},
abstract = {Qualitative data from 22 women and 18 men managers and their secretaries were analyzed to provide insights into gender differences in managerial styles. Traditional management style topologies, based largely on studies of men's behaviors, were called into question. Using an approach that allowed other topologies to emerge from the data, the respondents perceived that women were both task and people oriented, while men appeared image engrossed and autonomy invested. Respondents reported a strong preference for their gender-appropriate model and misunderstanding, even exasperation, with those using the alternative approach. The existence of such different models, especially if unrecognized, would place women at a disadvantage, since their success as managers is usually assessed by men who are likely to have a strong preference for the male-typed approach. The findings also suggest possible modifications to existing measures of managerial styles, particularly a consideration of image-engrossed approaches. Future research is suggested to further explore and confirm these findings.},
language = {en},
number = {7-8},
urldate = {2018-01-23},
journal = {Sex Roles},
author = {Statham, Anne},
month = apr,
year = {1987},
pages = {409--430}
}
 
Burke, Sarah, and Karen M. Collins. 2001. “Gender Differences in Leadership Styles and Management Skills.” Women in Management Review 16 (5):244–57. https://doi.org/10.1108/09649420110395728.
@article{burke_gender_2001,
title = {Gender differences in leadership styles and management skills},
volume = {16},
issn = {0964-9425},
url = {http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/09649420110395728},
doi = {10.1108/09649420110395728},
number = {5},
urldate = {2018-01-23},
journal = {Women in Management Review},
author = {Burke, Sarah and Collins, Karen M.},
month = aug,
year = {2001},
pages = {244--257}
}
 
Eagly, Alice H., and Blair T. Johnson. 1990. “Gender and Leadership Style: A Meta-Analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 108 (2):233.
@article{eagly_gender_1990,
title = {Gender and leadership style: {A} meta-analysis.},
volume = {108},
shorttitle = {Gender and leadership style},
number = {2},
journal = {Psychological bulletin},
author = {Eagly, Alice H. and Johnson, Blair T.},
year = {1990},
pages = {233}
}
 
Brewer, Neil, Patricia Mitchell, and Nathan Weber. 2002. “Gender Role, Organizational Status, and Conflict Management Styles.” International Journal of Conflict Management 13 (1):78–94.
@article{brewer_gender_2002,
title = {Gender role, organizational status, and conflict management styles},
volume = {13},
number = {1},
journal = {International journal of conflict management},
author = {Brewer, Neil and Mitchell, Patricia and Weber, Nathan},
year = {2002},
pages = {78--94}
}
 
Oakley, Judith G. 2000. “Gender-Based Barriers to Senior Management Positions: Understanding the Scarcity of Female CEOs.” Journal of Business Ethics 27 (4):321–334.
@article{oakley_gender-based_2000,
title = {Gender-based barriers to senior management positions: {Understanding} the scarcity of female {CEOs}},
volume = {27},
shorttitle = {Gender-based barriers to senior management positions},
number = {4},
journal = {Journal of business ethics},
author = {Oakley, Judith G.},
year = {2000},
pages = {321--334}
}
 
Rutherford, Sarah. 2001. “Any Difference? An Analysis of Gender and Divisional Management Styles in a Large Airline.” Gender, Work & Organization 8 (3):326–345.
@article{rutherford_any_2001,
title = {Any difference? {An} analysis of gender and divisional management styles in a large airline},
volume = {8},
shorttitle = {Any difference?},
number = {3},
journal = {Gender, Work \& Organization},
author = {Rutherford, Sarah},
year = {2001},
pages = {326--345}
}
 
Rigg, Clare, and John Sparrow. 1994. “Gender, Diversity and Working Styles.” Women in Management Review 9 (1):9–16.
@article{rigg_gender_1994,
title = {Gender, diversity and working styles},
volume = {9},
number = {1},
journal = {Women in Management Review},
author = {Rigg, Clare and Sparrow, John},
year = {1994},
pages = {9--16}
}
 
CLAES, Marie-Thérèse. 1999. “Women, Men and Management Styles.” International Labour Review 138 (4):431–446.
@article{claes_women_1999,
title = {Women, men and management styles},
volume = {138},
number = {4},
journal = {International Labour Review},
author = {CLAES, Marie-Thérèse},
year = {1999},
pages = {431--446}
}
 
Korabik, Karen, Galen L. Baril, and Carol Watson. 1993. “Managers’ Conflict Management Style and Leadership Effectiveness: The Moderating Effects of Gender.” Sex Roles 29 (5–6):405–420.
@article{korabik_managers_1993,
title = {Managers' conflict management style and leadership effectiveness: {The} moderating effects of gender},
volume = {29},
shorttitle = {Managers' conflict management style and leadership effectiveness},
number = {5-6},
journal = {Sex roles},
author = {Korabik, Karen and Baril, Galen L. and Watson, Carol},
year = {1993},
pages = {405--420}
}
 
Ragins, Belle Rose, Bickley Townsend, and Mary Mattis. 1998a. “Gender Gap in the Executive Suite: CEOs and Female Executives Report on Breaking the Glass Ceiling.” The Academy of Management Executive 12 (1):28–42.
———. 1998b. “Gender Gap in the Executive Suite: CEOs and Female Executives Report on Breaking the Glass Ceiling.” The Academy of Management Executive 12 (1):28–42.
@article{ragins_gender_1998,
title = {Gender gap in the executive suite: {CEOs} and female executives report on breaking the glass ceiling},
volume = {12},
shorttitle = {Gender gap in the executive suite},
number = {1},
journal = {The Academy of Management Executive},
author = {Ragins, Belle Rose and Townsend, Bickley and Mattis, Mary},
year = {1998},
pages = {28--42}
}
 
Engen, Marloes L., Rien Leeden, and Tineke M. Willemsen. 2001. “Gender, Context and Leadership Styles: A Field Study.” Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 74 (5):581–598.
@article{engen_gender_2001,
title = {Gender, context and leadership styles: {A} field study},
volume = {74},
shorttitle = {Gender, context and leadership styles},
number = {5},
journal = {Journal of occupational and organizational psychology},
author = {Engen, Marloes L. and Leeden, Rien and Willemsen, Tineke M.},
year = {2001},
pages = {581--598}
}
 
Smith, Patricia L., and Ellwood F. Oakley. 1997. “Gender-Related Differences in Ethical and Social Values of Business Students: Implications for Management.” Journal of Business Ethics 16 (1):37–45.
@article{smith_gender-related_1997,
title = {Gender-related differences in ethical and social values of business students: {Implications} for management},
volume = {16},
shorttitle = {Gender-related differences in ethical and social values of business students},
number = {1},
journal = {Journal of Business Ethics},
author = {Smith, Patricia L. and Oakley, Ellwood F.},
year = {1997},
pages = {37--45}
}
 
Cotter, David A., Joan M. Hermsen, Seth Ovadia, and Reeve Vanneman. 2001. “The Glass Ceiling Effect.” Social Forces 80 (2):655–681.
@article{cotter_glass_2001,
title = {The glass ceiling effect},
volume = {80},
number = {2},
journal = {Social forces},
author = {Cotter, David A. and Hermsen, Joan M. and Ovadia, Seth and Vanneman, Reeve},
year = {2001},
pages = {655--681}
}
 
Bass, Bernard M., and Bruce J. Avolio. 1994. “Shatter the Glass Ceiling: Women May Make Better Managers.” Human Resource Management 33 (4):549–560.
@article{bass_shatter_1994,
title = {Shatter the glass ceiling: {Women} may make better managers},
volume = {33},
shorttitle = {Shatter the glass ceiling},
number = {4},
journal = {Human resource management},
author = {Bass, Bernard M. and Avolio, Bruce J.},
year = {1994},
pages = {549--560}
}
 
Powell, Gary N., and D. Anthony Butterfield. 1994. “Investigating the ‘glass Ceiling’ Phenomenon: An Empirical Study of Actual Promotions to Top Management.” Academy of Management Journal 37 (1):68–86.
@article{powell_investigating_1994,
title = {Investigating the “glass ceiling” phenomenon: {An} empirical study of actual promotions to top management},
volume = {37},
shorttitle = {Investigating the “glass ceiling” phenomenon},
number = {1},
journal = {Academy of Management Journal},
author = {Powell, Gary N. and Butterfield, D. Anthony},
year = {1994},
pages = {68--86}
}
 
Mattis, Mary C. 2004. “Women Entrepreneurs: Out from under the Glass Ceiling.” Women in Management Review 19 (3):154–63. https://doi.org/10.1108/09649420410529861.
@article{mattis_women_2004,
title = {Women entrepreneurs: out from under the glass ceiling},
volume = {19},
issn = {0964-9425},
shorttitle = {Women entrepreneurs},
url = {http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/09649420410529861},
doi = {10.1108/09649420410529861},
number = {3},
urldate = {2018-01-23},
journal = {Women in Management Review},
author = {Mattis, Mary C.},
month = apr,
year = {2004},
pages = {154--163}
}
 
Arfken, Deborah E., Stephanie L. Bellar, and Marilyn M. Helms. 2004a. “The Ultimate Glass Ceiling Revisited: The Presence of Women on Corporate Boards.” Journal of Business Ethics 50 (2):177–86. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000022125.95758.98.
———. 2004b. “The Ultimate Glass Ceiling Revisited: The Presence of Women on Corporate Boards.” Journal of Business Ethics 50 (2):177–86. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000022125.95758.98.
@article{arfken_ultimate_2004,
title = {The {Ultimate} {Glass} {Ceiling} {Revisited}: {The} {Presence} of {Women} on {Corporate} {Boards}},
volume = {50},
issn = {0167-4544, 1573-0697},
shorttitle = {The {Ultimate} {Glass} {Ceiling} {Revisited}},
url = {https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000022125.95758.98},
doi = {10.1023/B:BUSI.0000022125.95758.98},
abstract = {Has the diversity of corporate boards of directors improved? Should it? What role does diversity play in reducing corporate wrongdoing? Will diversity result in a more focused board of directors or more board autonomy? Examining the state of Tennessee as a case study, the authors collected data on the board composition of publicly traded corporations and compared those data to an original study conducted in 1995. Data indicate only a modest improvement in board diversity. This article discusses reasons for the scarcity of women on boards and concludes that, to enhance strategic decisions, board membership should reflect the corporation's consumer population. Thus, women are a critical but overlooked resource. Areas for future research are also considered.},
language = {en},
number = {2},
urldate = {2018-01-23},
journal = {Journal of Business Ethics},
author = {Arfken, Deborah E. and Bellar, Stephanie L. and Helms, Marilyn M.},
month = mar,
year = {2004},
pages = {177--186}
}
 
Goodman, Jodi S., Dail L. Fields, and Terry C. Blum. 2003. “Cracks in the Glass Ceiling: In What Kinds of Organizations Do Women Make It to the Top?” Group & Organization Management 28 (4):475–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601103251232.
@article{goodman_cracks_2003,
title = {Cracks in the {Glass} {Ceiling}: {In} {What} {Kinds} of {Organizations} {Do} {Women} {Make} it to the {Top}?},
volume = {28},
issn = {1059-6011},
shorttitle = {Cracks in the {Glass} {Ceiling}},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601103251232},
doi = {10.1177/1059601103251232},
abstract = {This study investigates variables that differentiate work establishments that have women in top management positions from those that do not. Women occupied top management positions in slightly more than half of the 228 medium- to large-sized private sector establishments the authors studied. The authors found that women are more likely to occupy top management ranks in establishments that have more lower level management positions filled by women, have higher management turnover, have lower average management salary levels, place greater emphasis on development and promotion of employees, and operate in nonmanufacturing industries.},
language = {en},
number = {4},
urldate = {2018-01-23},
journal = {Group \& Organization Management},
author = {Goodman, Jodi S. and Fields, Dail L. and Blum, Terry C.},
month = dec,
year = {2003},
pages = {475--501}
}
 
Mainiero, Lisa A. 1994a. “On Breaking the Glass Ceiling: The Political Seasoning of Powerful Women Executives.” Organizational Dynamics 22 (4):5–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(94)90075-2.
———. 1994b. “On Breaking the Glass Ceiling: The Political Seasoning of Powerful Women Executives.” Organizational Dynamics 22 (4):5–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(94)90075-2.
@article{mainiero_breaking_1994,
title = {On breaking the glass ceiling: {The} political seasoning of powerful women executives},
volume = {22},
issn = {0090-2616},
shorttitle = {On breaking the glass ceiling},
url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0090261694900752},
doi = {10.1016/0090-2616(94)90075-2},
number = {4},
urldate = {2018-01-23},
journal = {Organizational Dynamics},
author = {Mainiero, Lisa A.},
month = mar,
year = {1994},
pages = {5--20}
}
Retrieved from "http://www.edegan.com/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/22506"

Navigation menu