Difference between revisions of "Google Scholar Crawler"

From edegan.com
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{McNair Projects
 
{{McNair Projects
 
|Has title=Google Scholar Crawler
 
|Has title=Google Scholar Crawler
|Has owner=Harsh Upadhyay,
+
|Has owner=Christy Warden,
|Has start date=November 10, 2016
+
|Has start date=November 10, 2017
 
|Has keywords=Google, Scholar,Tool
 
|Has keywords=Google, Scholar,Tool
|Has project status=Tabled
+
|Has project status=Active
 +
|Depends upon it=[[PTLR Webcrawler]]
 
}}
 
}}
 
==Overview==
 
==Overview==

Revision as of 18:27, 28 November 2017


McNair Project
Google Scholar Crawler
Project logo 02.png
Project Information
Project Title Google Scholar Crawler
Owner Christy Warden
Start Date November 10, 2017
Deadline
Keywords Google, Scholar, Tool
Primary Billing
Notes
Has project status Active
Copyright © 2016 edegan.com. All Rights Reserved.


Overview

Google Scholar does not have its own API provided by Google. This page is dedicated to investigation into alternative methods for parsing and crawling data from Google Scholar.

Existing Libraries

A couple of Python parsers for Google Scholar exist, but they do not satisfy everything we need from this crawler.

Scholar.py

The scholar.py script is the most extensive command line tool for parsing Google Scholar information. Given a search query, it returns results such as title, URL, year, number of citations, Cluster ID, Citations list, Version list, and an excerpt.

For example, once scholar.py is downloaded and all necessary components are installed the following command:

python scholar.py -c 3 --phrase "innovation" 

produces the following results:

Title Mastering the dynamics of innovation: how companies can seize opportunities in the face of technological change
          URL http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1496719
         Year 1994
    Citations 5107
     Versions 5
   Cluster ID 6139131108983230018
Citations list http://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=6139131108983230018&as_sdt=2005&sciodt=0,5&hl=en
Versions list http://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=6139131108983230018&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5
      Excerpt Abstract: Explores how innovation transforms industries, suggesting a strategic model to help firms to adjust to ever-shifting market dynamics. Understanding and adapting to innovation--  
'at once the creator and destroyer of industries and corporations'--is essential  ...
        Title National innovation systems: a comparative analysis
          URL http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=YFDGjgxc2CYC&oi=fnd&pg=PR7&dq=%22innovation%22&ots=Opaxro2BTV&sig=9-svcPMAzs8nHezDp94Z-HATdRk
         Year 1993
    Citations 8590
     Versions 6
   Cluster ID 13756840170990063961
Citations list http://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=13756840170990063961&as_sdt=2005&sciodt=0,5&hl=en
Versions list http://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=13756840170990063961&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5
      Excerpt The slowdown of growth in Western industrialized nations in the last twenty years, along with the rise of Japan as a major economic and technological power (and enhanced technical   
sophistication of Taiwan, Korea, and other NICs) has led to what the authors believe to be  ...
        Title Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy
          URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0048733386900272
         Year 1986
    Citations 10397
     Versions 38
   Cluster ID 14785720633759689821
Citations list http://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=14785720633759689821&as_sdt=2005&sciodt=0,5&hl=en
Versions list http://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=14785720633759689821&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5
      Excerpt Abstract This paper attempts to explain why innovating firms often fail to obtain significant economic returns from an innovation, while customers, imitators and other industry participants  
benefit Business strategy—particularly as it relates to the firm's decision to  ...


Scholarly

Another parser of potential interest is scholarly. However, it produces less information than the scholar parser does.