Difference between revisions of "Mcdevitt (2010) - Names And Reputations An Empirical Analysis"
imported>Ed (New page: ==Reference(s)== McDevitt, Ryan (2010), "Names and Reputations: An Empirical Analysis," mimeo, northwestern university [http://www.edegan.com/pdfs/McDevitt%20(2010)%20-%20Names%20and%20Rep...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{Article | ||
| + | |Has page= | ||
| + | |Has title= | ||
| + | |Has author= | ||
| + | |Has year= | ||
| + | |In journal= | ||
| + | |In volume= | ||
| + | |In number= | ||
| + | |Has pages= | ||
| + | |Has publisher= | ||
| + | }} | ||
==Reference(s)== | ==Reference(s)== | ||
McDevitt, Ryan (2010), "Names and Reputations: An Empirical Analysis," mimeo, northwestern university [http://www.edegan.com/pdfs/McDevitt%20(2010)%20-%20Names%20and%20Reputations%20An%20Empirical%20Analysis.pdf pdf] | McDevitt, Ryan (2010), "Names and Reputations: An Empirical Analysis," mimeo, northwestern university [http://www.edegan.com/pdfs/McDevitt%20(2010)%20-%20Names%20and%20Reputations%20An%20Empirical%20Analysis.pdf pdf] | ||
Revision as of 11:48, 29 September 2020
| Article | |
|---|---|
| Has bibtex key | |
| Has article title | |
| Has year | |
| In journal | |
| In volume | |
| In number | |
| Has pages | |
| Has publisher | |
| © edegan.com, 2016 | |
Reference(s)
McDevitt, Ryan (2010), "Names and Reputations: An Empirical Analysis," mimeo, northwestern university pdf
Abstract
This paper tests several predictions of the theoretical literature on firm reputation. A main result in the literature, that poor past performance will prompt a firm to conceal its reputation, is confirmed empirically in the market for residential plumbing services. A firm with a record of complaints one standard deviation above the mean was 133.2% more likely to change its name than the average �firm. In addition, �firms with longer track records were less likely to change their names or exit, while �firms that made more �firm-specific investments, such as advertising, were more likely to change their names than exit. Finally, �firms in small markets were found to value their reputations comparatively more than firms in large markets.