Difference between revisions of "Can Small Firms Mitigate their Disadvantages in Patent Litigation?"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
# qualifies as small entity | # qualifies as small entity | ||
# has not been named as inventor on more than 4 previously filed patent applic | # has not been named as inventor on more than 4 previously filed patent applic | ||
| + | ## blahj bnkldsadasd | ||
| + | ## faofoasfasfasf | ||
| + | ### asdasdasdas | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 14:59, 20 June 2016
| Can Small Firms Mitigate their Disadvantages in Patent Litigation? | |
|---|---|
| Project Information | |
| Project Title | |
| Start Date | |
| Deadline | |
| Primary Billing | |
| Notes | |
| Has project status | |
| Copyright © 2016 edegan.com. All Rights Reserved. | |
Abstract
An Academic Paper focused on the disproportionate patent litigation provided to small firms. Lex data will be used to acquire data on patent lawsuits.
Micro-entity under Leahy-Smith America Invents Act
Under section 123 of the United States Code Title 35 an applicant would qualify as micro entity if the applicant
- qualifies as small entity
- has not been named as inventor on more than 4 previously filed patent applic
- blahj bnkldsadasd
- faofoasfasfasf
- asdasdasdas
